Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 22-348    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 11/16/2022
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 205 GEORGE STREET WEST. (File No. CG2203A1, Assessment No. 220109)
Sponsors: Rebecca Noecker
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 2
Attachments: 1. 205 George Street West. Assessment Inquiry Ticjet. 9-29-2022, 2. 205 George Street West. FW 205 George St W - Q2 2022 Assessment Inquiry. 9-29-2022
Related files: RLH AR 22-94
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 205 GEORGE STREET WEST. (File No. CG2203A1, Assessment No. 220109)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 10/6/2022
Time of LH: 9:00 AM
Date of CPH: 11/16/2022

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Dana Diederich
Cost: $33.37
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Unpaid Garbage Bill; April 1 - June 30
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: Quarter 2 (April - June) 2021
Invoice Date(s): April 1 - June 30
Garbage Hauler: Republic Services
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): I purchased this property June 20, 2022. This bill is not mine as the seller still owned this property during its delinquent payments.
Staff Comments: Hauler records show that service was provided for one 64-gal cart during Q2 2022. The reason that the invoiced amount was less than the base cost of a 64-gal cart was due to a credit being applied to the account for a service hold during Quarter 1 2022 for one of the residential units. Since the current property owner is responsible for all currently pending assessments on the property, staff recommends approving the assessment.

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during April to June 2022. (File No. CG2203A1, Assessment No. 220109) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.