Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 20-344    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/26/2020
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 556 MANOMIN AVENUE. (File No. CG2002A3, Assessment No. 200122)
Sponsors: Rebecca Noecker
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 2
Attachments: 1. 556 Manomin Avenue.RE 556 Manomin Avenue Assessment Error.6-04-2020
Related files: RLH TA 20-343, RLH TA 20-345, RLH AR 20-105
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 556 MANOMIN AVENUE. (File No. CG2002A3, Assessment No. 200122)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 7/9/2020
Time of LH: 10:00:00 AM
Date of CPH: 8/26/2020

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Jacquelyn M Mcnamara
Cost: $107.02
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Garbage Service Medium Cart Weekly; 3 Late Fees; Jan 1-Mar 31 2020
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: 1st Quarter of 2020 (January 1 - March 31)
Invoice Date(s): January 1 - March 31
Garbage Hauler: Republic
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): Property owner stated that they made a total of three payments to the hauler. On 01/28/2020 they made a payment of $150. On 02/19/2020 they made a payment of $100, and on 02/28/2020 they made a payment of $97.72. Therefore they feel that they should not have to pay the assessment.
Staff Comments: Hauler confirmed that property owner made the above payments to their open market account and not to their coordinated collection account. They stated that they have moved the payment of $150 to the coordinated collection account. Therefore staff recommends removing the assessment.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2020. (File No. CG2002A3, Assessment No. 200122) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financial...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.