Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 19-592    Version: Name: 695 Hazel St N
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 9/11/2019
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 695 HAZEL STREET NORTH. (File No. CG1902C1, Assessment No. 190109)
Sponsors: Jane L. Prince
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 7
Attachments: 1. 695 Hazel St N.Email Communication with Republic Services.7-25-19
Related files: RLH AR 19-84
Title

Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 695 HAZEL STREET NORTH. (File No. CG1902C1, Assessment No. 190109)

Hearing Date(s)

Date of LH: 7/25/19

Time of LH: 9:00 AM

Date of CPH: 9/11/19

Tax Assessment Worksheet

Postcard Returned by: Joan Buss

Cost: $2.46

Hauling Service(s) Provided: Garbage Service; Jan 1 - Mar 31 2019

Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling

Billing Time Period: 1st Quarter of 2019

Invoice Date(s):

Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:

Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): Joan reported that she spoke with an RS manager on 01/19 to discuss the billing on her property. Joan stated that she told the manager she is going to pay on a monthly basis and the manager stated that she has been paying before the 25th of each month so the late fees are going to be waived. Joan reported that she has been paying the bill in this manner since 01/19 and that the late fees have been waived .

Staff Comments: According to information provided by Republic Services, the property owner does not appear to be in any arrangement for partial payment. The property owner is responsible for paying this outstanding charge.

Body

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2019. (File No. CG1902C1, Assessment No. 190109) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefor...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.