Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 16-322    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/17/2016
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 586-588 REANEY AVENUE (File No. J1611A, Assessment No. 168527).
Sponsors: Dan Bostrom
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 6
Attachments: 1. 588 Reaney Ave.Summary Abatement, 2. 588 Reaney Ave.Photo.4-25-16
Related files: RLH AR 16-50, RES 16-934
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 586-588 REANEY AVENUE (File No. J1611A, Assessment No. 168527).

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: July 19, 2016; owner called to reschedule; August 2, 2016
Date of CPH: August 17, 2016

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $316
Service Charge: $160
Total Assessment: $476
Gold Card Returned by: appeal requested by phone by property manager Trevor Pearson 952-451-6814
Type of Order/Fee: Summary Abatement
Nuisance: Failure to Maintain Exterior of Property
Date of Orders: April 20, 2016
Compliance Date: April 25, 2016
Re-Check Date: April 25, 2016
Date Work Done: April 26, 2016
Work Order #: WO # PA 16-029928
Returned Mail?: No
Comments: Note, 586 and 588 Reaney share a PIN: 292922430101. The assessment roll uses "586," but over the years, orders have been specified for each of the sides of the parcel. Note also, there was an order in April for the 586 side for a toilet by the sidewalk. It was abated and is a separate issue from this assessment. Delete per DSI because of the C of O party didn't get notified.
History of Orders on Property: 5 SA and 1 WO since July 2012 at 588; 10 SA and 4 WO since Oct. 2012 at 586

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Property Clean Up services from April 1 to 28, 2016 (File No. J1611A, Assessment No. 168527) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It


Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.