Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 16-165    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 5/18/2016
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 854 TATUM STREET. (File No. J1607E, Assessment No. 168308)
Sponsors: Russ Stark
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 4
Attachments: 1. 854 Tatum St.CN Ext 1-13-16, 2. 854 Tatum St.EC 12-9-15, 3. 854 Tatum St.Photos 12-9-15, 4. 854 Tatum St.EC 10-26-15, 5. 854 Tatum St.Photos 10-26-15, 6. 854 Tatum St.CN Ext 11-26-14, 7. 854 Tatum St.CN 6-20-14, 8. 854 Tatum St.Photos 5-22-14
Related files: RLH TA 16-350, RLH AR 16-17
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 854 TATUM STREET. (File No. J1607E, Assessment No. 168308)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: April 5, 2016 (rescheduled from March 29, 2016)
Date of CPH: May 18, 2016

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $120.00

Service Charge: $35.00

Total Assessment: $155.00

Gold Card Returned by: Sharon Anderson

Type of Order/Fee: Excessive consumption fee

Nuisance: Failure to maintain exterior of property

Date of Orders: June 20, 2014

Compliance Date: July 25, 2014

Re-Check Date: 11/26/14, 10/26/15, 12/9/15 and 1/11/16

Date Work Done: N/A

Work Order #: 14-197987 Inv#: 1206686

Returned Mail?: NO

Comments: Initial inspection took place on 4/29/214; a CN was not sent to owner until 6/20/14. Property was re-inspected on 11/26/14 and an extension was granted to 5/1/15. Property was re-inspected on 10/26/15 and EC was issued for non-compliance. Property was re-inspected on 12/9/15 and another EC was issued for non-compliance. Owner contacted the inspector and was granted an extension to 5/1/16 to repair the retaining wall.

History of Orders on Property:

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Inspection/Abatement services billed during October 22 to November 20, 2015. (File No. J1607E, Assessment No. 168308) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It


Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.