Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 14-552    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 1/7/2015
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Real Estate Project No. J1501E, Assessment No. 158300 at 512 CENTRAL AVENUE WEST.
Sponsors: Dai Thao
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 512 Central Ave W.EC Ltr 5-16-14, 2. 512 Central Ave W.Correct Notice 11-14-13, 3. 512 Central Ave W.EC Photo 5-16-14
Related files: RLH AR 14-71
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Real Estate Project No. J1501E, Assessment No. 158300 at 512 CENTRAL AVENUE WEST.

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $240
Service Charge: $35
Total Assessment: $275
Gold Card Returned by: Kenneth Cobb for Priscilla Cobb
Type of Order/Fee: Excessive consumption fees
Nuisance: Failure to maintain exterior of property
Date of Orders: November 14, 2013
Compliance Date: November 26, 2013
Re-Check Date: 12/11/13 Compliance Recheck - Not able to complete work because of weather; 2/26/14 Compliance Recheck - Put out until 3-26-14 weather 5/16/14 Compliance Recheck - Roof not repaired - EC issued
Date Work Done: Work still not done
Work Order #: 13-249990 Inv#: 1110052
Returned Mail?: NO
Comments: Delete one fee of $120 (Inv# 1110051) as this was sent to assessment in error. Fee should be $120, plus admin fee of $35, for a total of $155.
History of Orders on Property: According to note by inspector, the owner no longer lives in home and is confined to a nursing home; property is vacant. File was transferred to Fire C of O who condemned the property on July 1, 2014; lacking basic facilities/no utilities in service.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection services during April 1 to May 21, 2014. (File No. J1501E, Assessment No. 158300) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council's Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.