Saint Paul logo
Meeting Name: Legislative Hearings Agenda status: Final-revised
Meeting date/time: 5/23/2019 9:00 AM Minutes status: Final  
Meeting location: Room 330 City Hall & Court House
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #TypeTitleActionResultAction DetailsVideo
RLH TA 19-362 11Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 885 CARROLL AVENUE. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-254 12Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1025 CHURCHILL STREET. (File No. CG1901E3, Assessment No. 190069)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-409 13Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 615 MARSHALL AVENUE. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-354 14Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 971 BEECH STREET. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-371 15Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1160 SHERBURNE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-370 16Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1182 SHERBURNE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-262 17Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1362 SHERBURNE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-353 18Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 699 SURREY AVENUE. (File No. CG1901C4, Assessment No. 190063)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-421 19Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 649 SIMON AVENUE. (File No. CG1901E3, Assessment No. 190069)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-419 110Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 559 ASBURY STREET. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-418 111Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1925 MARGARET STREET. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-260 112Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1981 THIRD STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064; amended to File No. CG1901D2-1, Assessment No. 190083, and to delete the assessment) (Public hearing continued from June 12)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-256 113Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1178 THOMAS AVENUE. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-410 114Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealRatifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1485 VAN BUREN AVENUE. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH TA 19-420 115Resolution LH Tax Assessment AppealDeleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1938 MINNEHAHA AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH AR 19-64 116Resolution LH Assessment RollRatifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901E3, Assessment No. 190069)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH AR 19-65 117Resolution LH Assessment RollRatifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901E4, Assessment No. 190070)Referred  Action details Not available
RLH AR 19-66 118Resolution LH Assessment RollRatifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901D2, Assessment No. 190064)Referred  Action details Not available
File #Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
RLH TA 19-410 6/12/2019 9:58 AMEric Lein Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) should have been “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient….” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. On May 30, 2019, Judge Castro ruled that, “THE CITY COUNCIL DID NOT PROPERLY EXERCISE ITS AUTHORITY IN REFUSING TO HAVE ORDINANCE 18-39 PLACED ON THE BALLOT.” All collection activities and pending aszessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: (1) The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided pursuant to any and all appeals; and (2) Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +1 -1 1
RLH AR 19-66 6/12/2019 9:32 AMEric Lein Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) should have been “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient….” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. On May 30, 2019, Judge Castro ruled that, “THE CITY COUNCIL DID NOT PROPERLY EXERCISE ITS AUTHORITY IN REFUSING TO HAVE ORDINANCE 18-39 PLACED ON THE BALLOT.” All collection activities and pending aszessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: (1) The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided pursuant to any and all appeals; and (2) Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +1 -1 1
RLH AR 19-65 6/12/2019 9:31 AMEric Lein Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) should have been “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient….” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. On May 30, 2019, Judge Castro ruled that, “THE CITY COUNCIL DID NOT PROPERLY EXERCISE ITS AUTHORITY IN REFUSING TO HAVE ORDINANCE 18-39 PLACED ON THE BALLOT.” All collection activities and pending aszessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: (1) The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided pursuant to any and all appeals; and (2) Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +1 -1 1
RLH AR 19-64 6/12/2019 9:31 AMEric Lein Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) should have been “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient….” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. On May 30, 2019, Judge Castro ruled that, “THE CITY COUNCIL DID NOT PROPERLY EXERCISE ITS AUTHORITY IN REFUSING TO HAVE ORDINANCE 18-39 PLACED ON THE BALLOT.” All collection activities and pending aszessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: (1) The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided pursuant to any and all appeals; and (2) Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +1 -1 1