Details Meeting Name: City Council Agenda status: Final-revised Meeting date/time: 5/22/2019 3:30 PM Minutes status: Final   Meeting location: Council Chambers - 3rd Floor There will be no meeting on May 29, the fifth Wednesday of the month. Published agenda: Agenda Published minutes: Minutes   Meeting video: Video   Attachments: Meeting Items (120) Public Comments (90) 120 records Group Clear sorting Clear grouping Group by Type Group by Result Export Export to Excel Export to PDF Export to Word Show: Legislation only Legislation only All agenda items File # Ver. Agenda # Type Title Action Result Action Details Video AO 19-31 1 1 Administrative Order Amending CDBG activity budget with additional funding for 932 Arcade. Received and Filed   Action details Not available AO 19-32 1 2 Administrative Order Amending CDBG activity budget funding for 1315 Rice St. and 1319 Rice Street. Received and Filed   Action details Not available RES 19-844 1 3 Resolution Authorizing the City Attorney's Office to pursue an available funding opportunity offered by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Justice Programs. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-852 1 4 Resolution Authorizing the appointment of LeVander, Gillen & Miller, PA as outside counsel and authorizing the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-865 1 5 Resolution Accepting a gift of no more than $750 from the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans (PAAIA) to cover the costs of airfare, lodging, and food for Councilmember Mitra Jalali Nelson to attend their inaugural Civic Engagement Forum in Washington DC on June 7 and 8, 2019. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-872 1 6 Resolution Amending the grant award to Yoerg Brewing through the Neighborhood STAR Year-Round Program. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-871 1 7 Resolution Approving the use of grant funds through the Neighborhood STAR Year-Round Program for Olu’s Home. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-795 1 8 Resolution Approving adverse action against the Liquor on Sale - 101-180 Seats or Less, Liquor On Sale - Sunday, and Entertainment (A) licenses held by Twin City Beer Barons, d/b/a World of Beer (License ID #20140003000) at 356 Sibley Street. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-796 1 9 Resolution Approving adverse action against the Liquor On Sale - Sunday and Liquor On Sale - 100 Seats or Less licenses held by Gazta and Enhancement LLC, d/b/a Gazta and Enhancement (License ID #20180002846) at 928 7th Street. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-823 1 10 Resolution Authorizing the proper City officials to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County for solid waste and recycling funding for the term July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2024. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES 19-873 1 12 Resolution Designating May 2019 as Older Americans Month. Adopted Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-38 1 13 Resolution-Public Hearing Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Arlington Avenue. (File No. MO1802, Assessment No. 185501) (Public hearing held April 3; laid over from June 5) Laid Over Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-40 1 14 Resolution-Public Hearing Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Stryker Avenue. (File No. MO1805, Assessment No. 185503) (Public hearing held April 3; laid over from June 5) Laid Over Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-41 1 15 Resolution-Public Hearing Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Forest Street. (File No. MO1806, Assessment No. 185504) (Public hearing held April 3; laid over from June 5) Laid Over Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-42 1 16 Resolution-Public Hearing Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Victoria Street. (File No. MO1807, Assessment No. 185505) (Public hearing held April 3; laid over from June 5) Laid Over Pass Action details Not available SR 19-42 1 11 Staff Report Maxfield Scholars Presentation on Littering and Pollution in the City of Saint Paul. Received and Filed   Action details Video RES PH 19-144 2 17 Resolution-Public Hearing Recommending that Ramsey County implement pedestrian refuge medians and bicycling facilities on Payne Avenue from Woodward Avenue to Edgerton Street. (Public hearing held May 15) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-155 3 18 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1895 SAINT ANTHONY AVENUE. (File No. VB1907, Assessment No. 198806; amended to File No. VB1907B, Assessment No. 198819) (Public hearing held May 15) Laid Over Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-190 2 19 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1533 WYNNE AVENUE. (File No. J1907B, Assessment No. 198106) (Public hearing held May 15) Adopted As Amended Pass Action details Video Ord 19-1 2 20 Ordinance Amending Chapter 74 of the Legislative Code by enacting a new section designating St. Andrew's Church as a Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Site. Laid Over to Final Adoption Pass Action details Video Ord 19-29 2 21 Ordinance Amending Chapter 81 of the Legislative Code pertaining to the City’s stormwater sewer system by adding new language providing for the creation of green infrastructure stormwater management districts and authorizing the collection of charges for payment of the capital and annual maintenance and operational costs of green infrastructure stormwater management systems. Adopted As Amended Pass Action details Video Ord 19-33 1 22 Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 16740 establishing the Muskego Church Heritage Preservation Site, approved on October 28, 1978 under Council File No. 271887, to set new legal boundaries based upon the recommendation by the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission. Laid Over to Third Reading/Public Hearing   Action details Video Ord 19-31 1 23 Ordinance Granting the application of Paula Lilly to rezone property at 321 Irvine Avenue from R2 One-Family Residential to RT-1 Two-Family Residential, and amending Chapter 60 of the Legislative Code pertaining to the zoning map. Laid Over to Third Reading/Public Hearing   Action details Video Ord 19-32 2 24 Ordinance Granting the application of Bai Lor to rezone the property at 388 Minnehaha Avenue West from R4 Single Family Residential to RT1 Two Family Residential, and amending Chapter 60 of the Legislative Code pertaining to the zoning map. Laid Over to Second Reading   Action details Video RES 19-901 1   Resolution Approving the agreement between the Saint Paul Fire Department and Xcel Energy for use of a wind turbine for technical rescue training. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RES PH 19-147 1 25 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the application of Tawfiq Islamic Center for a sound level variance to provide amplified sound at 270 Lexington Parkway North on Tuesday June 4 and Wednesday, June 5, 2019 for Eidul-Fitr. Adopted Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-148 1 26 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the application of Flint Hills Family Festival for a sound level variance to present live music at 4th & Washington Streets and at Landmark Plaza from May 28 through June 1, 2019. Adopted Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-149 1 27 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the application of Minnesota United FC & Allianz Field for a sound level variance to present DJ Booth amplified music within the Beer Garden area on Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 400 Snelling Avenue North for the MN United FC vs Houston Dynamo - MLS Game. Adopted Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-150 1 28 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the application of Minnesota United FC & Allianz Field for a sound level variance in order to present DJ Booth amplified music within the Beer Garden area on Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 400 Snelling Avenue North for the MN United FC vs Philadelphia Union MLS Game. Adopted Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-137 1 29 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the application of Anderson Race Management for a sound level variance to present outdoor music and announcements for the Friends of Gillette Walk & Run on Saturday, June 8, 2019 at Como Park. Adopted Pass Action details Video RES PH 19-145 1 30 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the application of Hunter Sinclair Hawthorne for a sound level variance to present live amplified music Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 436 Roy Street North. Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH SAO 19-6 2 31 Resolution LH Summary Abatement Order Making finding on the appealed nuisance abatement ordered for 425 BRAINERD AVENUE in Council File RLH SAO 19-4. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH VO 19-15 2 32 Resolution LH Vacate Order Appeal of William Rolf, NCK1 LLC, to a Correction Notice-Complaint Inspection (which includes condemnation) at 1324 GRAND AVENUE and 1326 GRAND AVENUE. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH RR 19-15 3 33 Resolution LH Substantial Abatement Order Ordering the rehabilitation or razing and removal of the structures at 412 HOLLY AVENUE within fifteen (15) days after the April 24, 2019 City Council public hearing. (Amend to grant 180 days) Adopted As Amended Pass Action details Not available RLH SAO 19-32 2 34 Resolution LH Summary Abatement Order Making finding on the appealed nuisance abatement ordered for 71 MARYLAND AVENUE EAST in Council File RLH SAO 19-26. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH SAO 19-29 2 35 Resolution LH Summary Abatement Order Appeal of Gwynne Evans to a Summary Abatement Order at 680 PREBLE STREET. Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-176 4 36 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1467 SEVENTH STREET EAST. (File No. J1906B, Assessment No. 198105; amended to File No. J1906B1, Assessment No. 198110, and to delete the assessment) (Public hearing continued from April 17) Adopted As Amended Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-263 2 50 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 541 DAYTON AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-216 2 59 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 549 GRAND HILL. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-248 2 70 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 83 ISABEL STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-317 2 79 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 755 MINNEHAHA AVENUE WEST. (File No. CG1901C2, Assessment No. 190061) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-244 2 82 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 542 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-205 2 105 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 361 SUMMIT AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH AR 19-39 2 110 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted As Amended Pass Action details Video RLH AR 19-40 2 111 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Adopted As Amended Pass Action details Video RLH AR 19-41 2 112 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Video RLH TA 19-295 2 37 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1098 ALBEMARLE STREET. (File No. CG1901B3, Assessment No. 190059) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-282 2 38 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 816 ALBERT STREET NORTH. (File No. CG1901C2, Assessment No. 190061) (Public hearing continued from May 22) Continue Public Hearing   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-259 2 39 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1863 AMES AVENUE. (File No. CG1901C1, Assessment No. 190053) Adopted As Amended   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-302 2 40 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1154 ARUNDEL STREET. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-247 2 41 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 833 ASHLAND AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-322 2 42 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 500 BAY STREET. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-217 2 43 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2140 BAYARD AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-215 2 44 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 48 BELVIDERE STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-287 2 45 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1362 BERKELEY AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-252 2 46 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 812 CALIFORNIA AVENUE WEST. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-308 2 47 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1467 CASE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901C2, Assessment No. 190061) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-231 2 48 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 337 CURTICE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-224 2 49 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 487 DAYTON AVENUE UNIT 1. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-242 2 51 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 756 DAYTON AVENUE, UNIT 4. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-307 2 52 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1088 DULUTH STREET. (File No. CG1901C2, Assessment No. 190061) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-276 2 53 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1242 EDGERTON STREET. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-236 3 54 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2200 ELEANOR AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-296 2 55 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 243 ERIE STREET. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-305 2 56 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 271 FRONT AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-225 2 57 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 305 GEORGE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-243 2 58 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 322 GOODRICH AVE UNIT 2. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-234 2 60 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 761 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-226 2 61 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 882 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051; amend to File No. CG1901A1-1, Assessment No. 190071) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-203 2 62 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1790 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-275 2 63 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1316 HARTFORD AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-297 2 64 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 651 HAWTHORNE AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-241 2 65 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2049 HAWTHORNE AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-304 2 66 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2163 HAWTHORNE AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-269 2 67 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1663 HAZEL STREET NORTH. (File No. CG1901B3, Assessment No. 190059) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-237 2 68 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 546 HOLLY AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-271 2 69 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 679 HOYT AVENUE WEST. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-298 2 71 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1294 JEFFERSON AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-309 2 72 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2112 JESSAMINE AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901C1, Assessment No. 190053) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-289 2 73 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 559 LEXINGTON PARKWAY SOUTH. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted As Amended   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-227 2 74 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 586 LINCOLN AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted As Amended   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-277 2 75 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1392 MARION STREET. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-288 2 76 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1259 MATILDA STREET. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-280 2 77 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1538 MAYWOOD STREET. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted As Amended   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-290 2 78 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 559 MCKNIGHT ROAD SOUTH. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052; amend to File No. CG1901B1-1, Assessment No. 190074) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-202 2 80 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 62 MOUNDS BOULEVARD. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-270 2 81 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 592 NEVADA AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901B3, Assessment No. 190059) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-232 2 83 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 706 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-245 2 84 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 781 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-207 2 85 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 797 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-272 2 86 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 47 ORANGE AVENUE WEST. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-208 2 87 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 662 OTTAWA AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-213 2 88 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2136 PALACE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-303 2 89 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1400 PARK STREET. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-315 2 90 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 795 PEDERSEN STREET. (File No. CG1901C1, Assessment No. 190053) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-214 2 91 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 666 PORTLAND AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-291 2 92 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1350 PROSPERITY AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B3, Assessment No. 190059) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-229 2 93 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2176 RANDOLPH AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-281 2 94 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1240 RICE STREET. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-233 2 95 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 187 ROBIE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-246 2 96 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 197 ROBIE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-206 2 97 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 268 ROBIE STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-294 2 98 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1869 ROME AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-274 2 99 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1603 SAINT ALBANS STREET NORTH. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-218 2 100 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1711 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-201 2 101 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1768 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-240 2 102 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 25 SANDRA LEE DRIVE WEST. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-212 2 103 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 318 SIDNEY STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-314 2 104 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1820 STILLWATER AVENUE. (File No. CG1901C1, Assessment No.190053) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-228 2 106 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 434 SUPERIOR STREET. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-278 2 107 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 689 TUSCARORA AVENUE. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-200 2 108 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 110 VIRGINIA STREET. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH TA 19-273 2 109 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 161 WHEELOCK PARKWAY EAST. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted Pass Action details Not available RLH AR 19-42 2 113 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Adopted As Amended   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-44 2 114 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901B1, Assessment No. 190052) Adopted   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-45 2 115 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901B2, Assessment No. 190058) Adopted   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-46 2 116 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901B3, Assessment No. 190059) Adopted   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-47 2 117 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Adopted   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-48 2 118 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901C1, Assessment No. 190053) Adopted   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-49 2 119 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901C2, Assessment No. 190061) Adopted As Amended   Action details Not available  Add New Comment 90 records Group Clear sorting Clear grouping Group by File # Group by Name Group by District Group by Opinion Export Export to Excel Export to PDF Export to Word File # Date  Name District Opinion Comment Action RLH AR 19-49 5/22/2019 7:52 PM David Thom     Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-48 5/22/2019 7:51 PM Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-47 5/22/2019 7:50 PM Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-46 5/22/2019 7:49 PM David Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-45 5/22/2019 7:45 PM David Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-44 5/22/2019 7:44 PM David Hom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-42 5/22/2019 7:43 PM David Thm   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 7:42 PM David Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 7:40 PM David Thm   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 7:37 PM David Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when the ***essment adds no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH TA 19-282 5/22/2019 7:17 PM Eric Lein   Against RLH TA 19-201 5/22/2019 7:17 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-214 5/22/2019 7:16 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-202 5/22/2019 7:15 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-289 5/22/2019 7:14 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-237 5/22/2019 7:14 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-225 5/22/2019 7:12 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-236 5/22/2019 7:11 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-263 5/22/2019 7:10 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-231 5/22/2019 7:09 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-252 5/22/2019 7:09 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-287 5/22/2019 7:08 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-282 5/22/2019 7:06 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-200 5/22/2019 7:01 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-213 5/22/2019 7:01 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-298 5/22/2019 7:00 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-217 5/22/2019 7:00 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-271 5/22/2019 6:57 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH AR 19-49 5/22/2019 6:54 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH AR 19-48 5/22/2019 6:54 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-47 5/22/2019 6:54 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-46 5/22/2019 6:53 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-45 5/22/2019 6:53 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-44 5/22/2019 6:52 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-42 5/22/2019 6:49 PM Eric Lein   Against ?? ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ?? ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ?? ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ?? The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ?? Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ?? Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:38 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:38 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:37 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:37 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:36 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:35 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:35 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:34 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:34 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:34 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:32 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:32 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. +1 RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:31 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:31 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:29 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:29 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:28 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:27 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:27 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:26 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:24 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:24 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:23 PM     Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:23 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:22 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 5:44 PM David Thom   Against Dismiss all ***essments, the matter has yet to be decided by the courts. +1 5/22/2019 4:26 PM     Against Organized trash isn't the problem. The lack of research on how citizens and smaller, family run haulers will be affected, along with a contract that holds no one responsible for unacceptable service or no service at all is a problem. This program was poorly implemented and hasn't delivered any of the benefits we were told. The city council made a mistake, and continues to make it worse by not listening to what we, the people are saying. It's time to do the right thing and admit the mistake and start working on a solution. +1 RLH AR 19-49 5/22/2019 3:36 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-48 5/22/2019 3:35 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-47 5/22/2019 3:34 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-46 5/22/2019 3:33 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-45 5/22/2019 3:32 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-44 5/22/2019 3:31 PM David aThom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. +1 RLH AR 19-44 5/22/2019 3:30 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. +1 RLH AR 19-42 5/22/2019 3:29 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. +1 RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 3:28 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 3:27 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 3:24 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH TA 19-271 5/22/2019 2:17 PM Marguerite DeSpain   Against Critical concerns of citizens were reported in hearings and are not being shared with you, as there are many thousands of concerned citizens that are protesting this garbage program and see it as directly opposed to the environmental climate improvement plan with it's refusal to allow for neighbor-sharing and opting out when a bin is not necessary. The current garbage program implementation and fines is motivating more waste and not less. The way the City has chosen to implement organized trash collection has harmed many citizens, which these ***essments prove. It has also caused multiple small family garbage collectors to go out of business, gradually creating a new monopoly - Waste Management. Instead of responsibly preventing these harms when concerns were raised, Council members have stifled their concerns, acting as if helpless instead of insisting that there be negotiations and necessary changes made. We citizens of St. Paul are not represented by your silence. +4 RLH TA 19-271 5/22/2019 1:54 PM Marguerite DeSpain   Against I protest the ***essment to my property, as I participate in the trash program as a neighbor-sharer, as I have for more than twelve years, with a single adult household across the street. I choose to reduce my waste substantially both for the sake of the earth and our City and to save money. I have very little waste, as I eat mostly vegetables and eggs, and can easily compost their waste. If I have any waste that cannot be recycled or composted, such as packaging, I pay the neighbor to add a very small bag once in a while. We have harmoniously done this for many years, reducing the costs to us both. The City has refused to honor or acknowledge and follow my request to not have a bin, to pick up its bin left on my property without my permission, and is billing me for a service I did not request or ever use, which I see as unjust and oppressive. I offered to serve on a committee of citizens to add neighbor share to implementation, and help, with no response. Please stop this. +3 5/22/2019 1:20 PM       The unpaid bills are a protest to the garbage program in most cases, as these citizens are not USING the service. The Council's focus on penalizing citizens that are protesting the garbage program is a sham of leadership and a waste of citizen funds. Why has the Council not simply listened to these citizens' concerns and made adjustments to the implementation of the garbage program allowing reasonable opt-outs such as neighbor-sharing and a reduction in the number of bins where they are not needed by those citizens? Why is the Council fighting reduction of waste? Why has the Council not accepted the offer of reasonable professionals among these citizens that have offered to work with the Council on a committee to make adjustments to implementation of this program? Why is the Council refusing to negotiate with Haulers on behalf of these citizens it is paid to represent? Why is the Council simply leveraging oppressive fees against these citizens instead of working with them? This is wron +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 1:06 PM       Hold off tax ***essments and recognize those that are participating as neighbor sharers and be reasonable instead of sticking your heels into the ground like a vengeful politician. This is supposed to be about public safety - removing trash that exists, not fining people for not using a trash bin they never ordered or used! How can the City suddenly enforce trash participation in this one way, when people have not had trash service at these addresses for many years due to using less bins, or sharing with a neighbor, and being our most responsible citizens that are generating less waste? Please stop participating in this mania and speak out that this does not feel right and should stop! Thank you. +4 RLH AR 19-49 5/21/2019 9:42 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 1 RLH AR 19-48 5/21/2019 9:41 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-47 5/21/2019 9:41 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-46 5/21/2019 9:40 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-45 5/21/2019 9:40 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-44 5/21/2019 9:39 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-42 5/21/2019 9:39 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +4 RLH AR 19-41 5/21/2019 9:38 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 -1 RLH AR 19-40 5/21/2019 9:38 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-39 5/21/2019 9:37 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +4 RLH TA 19-205 5/21/2019 9:36 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH TA 19-216 5/21/2019 9:35 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending ***essments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +4 RES 19-823 5/16/2019 11:33 PM       It does not make any sense to enter into agreements regarding the garbage program until the court has ruled AND adjustments have been made to the program implementation that more responsibly respond to the very valid concerns that have been raised to allow for neighbor-sharing and opt-outs, etc., and refund those that never had trash bins and did not ask for or use service. Hopefully the Council has learned it's lesson not to enter into long-term agreements related to new programs without allowing for ample flexibility in the agreements to make adjustments for evaluative learning and input. +6 1