Saint Paul logo
File #: RES 11-11    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 1/5/2011
Title: Memorializing City Council action taken November 3, 2010 reversing the decision of the Planning Commission and granting the appeal of Sandra Belisle for a Change in Nonconforming Use Permit to add a pet day-care and pet-boarding service for the property commonly known as 360 Clifton Street in Saint Paul.
Sponsors: Dave Thune
Related files: APC 10-3
Title
Memorializing City Council action taken November 3, 2010 reversing the decision of the Planning Commission and granting the appeal of Sandra Belisle for a Change in Nonconforming Use Permit to add a pet day-care and pet-boarding service for the property commonly known as 360 Clifton Street in Saint Paul.

Body
WHEREAS, Sandra Belisle, in PED Zoning File No. 10-506-183, made application to the Saint Paul Planning Commission (hereinafter, the Commission) for a Change of Nonconforming Use Permit to add a pet day-care and a pet-boarding service to an already existing pet-grooming business located at property commonly known as 360 Clifton St. (PIN No. 112823130033) and legally described as: Ramseys Sub Of B21 Stinson Br Lot 34 Blk 21; and

WHEREAS, the Commissions Zoning Committee, on July 8, 2010, pursuant to Leg. Code ยง 61.303, duly conducted a public hearing where all persons present were afforded an opportunity to be heard and, at the close of the hearing, the Committee laid the matter over with instructions to staff to make additional inquiries into the application and to present its findings at the Committee meeting on September 2, 2010; and

WHEREAS, on September 2, 2010, the Zoning Committee took up the matter of the said nonconforming use application and at the conclusion of the testimony, based upon the record, staff report, and the testimony presented at the public hearings, as substantially reflected in the Committees minutes, moved to recommend that the Commission deny the application; and

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2010, the Commission took up the recommendation of the Zoning Committee and the Commission, based upon all the files, records, and testimony, moved to deny the application based upon the following findings of fact as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 10-72, which is incorporated herein by reference:

1. The applicants current nonconforming use permit was approved by the Planning Commission on December 15, 2006, subject to the...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.