Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 23-241    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/2/2023
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 241-243 AURORA AVENUE. (File No. J2323A, Assessment No. 238530)
Sponsors: Russel Balenger
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 241-243 Aurora Ave.SA Order 3-8-23.pdf, 2. 241-243 Aurora Ave Photo 3-8-23.pdf, 3. 241-243 Aurora Ave Photo 3-15-23.pdf
Related files: RLH AR 23-56
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 241-243 AURORA AVENUE. (File No. J2323A, Assessment No. 238530)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 6/20/23
Time of LH: 10 am
Date of CPH: 8/2/23

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $316
Service Charge: $162
Total Assessment: $478
Name of Property Owner/Representative of Management Co.: Vatou Her
Type of Order/Fee: Summary Abatement Order
Nuisance: Mattresses behind building
Date of Orders: 3/8/23
Compliance Date: 3/15/23
Re-Check Date: 3/15/23-not removed, sent wo
Date Work Done: 4/12/23
Work Order #: 23-021339
Returned Mail?: No. Mails were sent to occupant and Vatou Her/Ying Her, 166 McCarrons Blvd S, Roseville MN 55116
Comments: Per LOGIS, changed of address was made on 7/17/22 to 108 Battle Creek Rd. 241 and 243 had different PIN #s. Division changed in 2009 and new PIN # is 36-29-41-0057. However, Amanda/STAMP do not have this information. Real Estate Office sent in a request to IT to get this fix.
History of Orders on Property: 243 Aurora: 4/10/23-garbage (no wo), 2/28/23-garbage(wo done), 10/27/22-garbage (no wo), 1/12/22-garbage (no wo), 11/9/20-veh 11/16-SA-ec done, 12/4/18-garbage (no wo); 241 Aurora: 11/22/22-garbage - no wo, 10/27/22-veh -not founded, 9/21/22-dumping sent to PW

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Assessment Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Property Clean Up services during April 5 to 13, 2023 (File No. J2323A, Assessment No. 238530) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further consider...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.