Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 23-9    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 2/22/2023
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 627 MENDOTA STREET. (File No. J2304E, Assessment No. 238303)
Sponsors: Jane L. Prince
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 7
Attachments: 1. 627 Mendota St.SAO.8-11-22, 2. 627 Mendota St.VAO.8-11-22, 3. 627 Mendota St.EC.8-11-22
Related files: RLH VO 22-27, RLH AR 23-5

Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 627 MENDOTA STREET. (File No. J2304E, Assessment No. 238303)

Hearing Date(s)

Date of LH: 1/3/23

Time of LH:  10 am                     

Date of CPH: 2/22/23

Tax Assessment Worksheet

Cost:  $124

Service Charge: $35

Total Assessment:  $159

Gold Card Returned by: Jacob Smith

Type of Order/Fee: Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 07/25/22-08/19/22

Nuisance: SAO/VAO/EC sent 8/11/22 for 3+ violations in 12 months

Date of Orders: 8/11/22

Compliance Date: SAO 8/18/22, VAO 8/18/22

Re-Check Date: 8/23/22, 9/22/22

Date Work Done: file closed 12/7/22

Work Order #: 22 047191 Inv # 1677306

Returned Mail?: no

Comments: Current PO purchased 2/28/22. Appealed 9/27/22 for condemnation/order to vacate. Given to 10/31, then MM gave further extension to Nov 30 for compliance or property must be vacated. Pending C of O reinspection 1/3/23 for C of O being approved with corrections 12/1.

History of Orders on Property: 12/5/22 Snow/ice - done by parks 12/13; 4/722 SAO for firewood - done by owner; 2/28/22 SAO for trash - unfounded and file closed; all previously under prior owner.


WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during July 25 to August 19, 2022. (File No. J2304E, Assessment No. 238303) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.