Saint Paul logo
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 22-219    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 7/20/2022
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 991 FARRINGTON STREET. (File No. VB2210, Assessment No. 228815)
Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 5
Attachments: 1. 991 Farrington St.Renewal Letter.12-27-21.pdf, 2. 991 Farrington St.Warning Letter 1-26-22.pdf
Related files: RLH AR 22-52
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 991 FARRINGTON STREET. (File No. VB2210, Assessment No. 228815)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 6/7/22; 7/5/22
Time of LH: 9 AM
Date of CPH: 7/20/22

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $2127
Service Charge: $157
Total Assessment: $2284
Gold Card Returned by: Selena Hernandez
Type of Order/Fee: VB fee
Nuisance: unpaid VB fee
Date of Orders: Sale Review done on 7/1/21. Recorded at RC 8/27/21; Renewal Letter sent 12/27/21; Warning Letter 1/26/22 - Went to Assessment on 3/3/22
Work Order #: 19-005519, Inv # 1623183
Returned Mail?: No
Comments: Selena Hernandez bought property on 8/27/21. VB folder closed 4/22/22 and code compliance approved letter sent; VB Cat 2 opened 1/14/19. Owner paid the assessment on 5/24/22 per Assmt Office. I confirmed with her why she paid it if she wants to appeal it and she said she was told by "Reid" to pay it.
History of Orders on Property: 15 SA/TGW/Snow Letters sent between 1/28/19 and 1/26/21 with 6 work orders; New Registration form filled 1/28/21--5 SAO sent (no wo), New Registration form sent 6/2/21 with 1 SA sent on 9/2/21 (no wo)

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Vacant Building Registration fees billed during August 5 to January 17, 2022. (File No. VB2210, Assessment No. 228815) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.