Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 20-601    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 11/18/2020
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 979 FLANDRAU ST. (File No. CG2003B1, Assessment No. 200143)
Sponsors: Nelsie Yang
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 6
Attachments: 1. 979 Flandrau Street.Q2 2020 Assessment Inquiry. 9-30-2020, 2. 979 Flandrau St.Email chain.10-14-20.pdf
Related files: RLH TA 19-649, RLH AR 20-143
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 979 FLANDRAU ST. (File No. CG2003B1, Assessment No. 200143)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 10/15/2020
Time of LH: 10:00 AM
Date of CPH: 11/18/2020

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Rosemarie Rayes Cayax
Cost: $4.97
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Delinquent Garbage Bill Q2 2020; Service April to June 2020
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: 2nd Quarter of 2020 (April 1 - June 30)
Invoice Date(s): April 1 - June 30
Garbage Hauler: Advanced
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): Property owner stated that they made a payment for the Q2 2020 invoice on April 5, 2020. They stated that they should not have been charged a late fee of $4.97 when their payment was made on time.
Staff Comments: Staff confirmed with hauler that the invoice for Q2 2020 had been sent out on April 6, 2020 to the service address. Since the payment from the property owner for Q2 2020 was received by the hauler on 5/01/2020, there was a late fee of $4.97 added to the total invoice. As this late fee was justified, staff recommends approving the assessment.

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during April to June 2020. (File No. CG2003B1, Assessment No. 200143) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It


Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.