Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 20-147    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 4/8/2020
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2114 PINEHURST AVENUE. (File No. J2007E, Assessment No. 208306)
Sponsors: Chris Tolbert
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 3
Attachments: 1. 2114 Pinehurst Ave.SA Letter.9-12-19.pdf, 2. 2114 Pinehurst Ave.PA EC Letter.10-11-19.pdf, 3. 2114 Pinehurst Ave.Photo.10-9-19.pdf
Related files: RLH AR 20-49
Title

Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2114 PINEHURST AVENUE. (File No. J2007E, Assessment No. 208306)

Hearing Date(s)

Date of LH: 3-3-20

Time of LH:  10 AM

Date of CPH:4-8-20

Tax Assessment Worksheet

Cost:  $122

Service Charge: $35

Total Assessment:  $157

Gold Card Returned by: MATTHEW HOLLINSHEAD

Type of Order/Fee: PAEC FINE

Nuisance: FAILURE TO REMOVE FENCING ON BLVD

Date of Orders: 9-12-19

Compliance Date: 9-19-19

Re-Check Date: 10-7-19

Date Work Done: NA

Work Order #: 19-083198

Returned Mail?:  No

Comments: I recommend we delete the PAEC as the work crew did show up and had a discussion with the owner.  They told him to call me and they would give him time to remove the fence.  I was contacted and he agreed to remove the fence but stated his neighbor helped him and there is fencing on their boulevard too.  The neighbor called as well and stated they would be fine taking down the fence.  The fence was removed so we did achieve voluntary compliance and I gave them the information regarding temporary fencing vs. permanent fencing.

History of Orders on Property: Nothing since 4/10/17-fence issue

Body

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during September 23 to October 21, 2019. (File No. J2007E, Assessment No. 208306) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially sa...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.