Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 19-854    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 11/13/2019
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 754 MINNEHAHA AVENUE WEST. (File No. CG1903E3, Assessment No. 190139)
Sponsors: Dai Thao
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Related files: RLH AR 19-138
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 754 MINNEHAHA AVENUE WEST. (File No. CG1903E3, Assessment No. 190139)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 10/31/2019
Time of LH: 10:30 AM
Date of CPH: 11/13/2019

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Cameron Lepisto
Cost: $113.17
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Garbage Services; Apr 1 - Jun 30 2019
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: 2nd Quarter of 2019 (Apr 1 - Jun 30)
Invoice Date(s): 04/30/2019 - 06/30/2019
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): The city provided one cart (90 gal) and has been billing for two carts (90 and 68 gal). Service Provider is aware of the City's error and has credited my account each quarter. This includes the April through June period being assessed (pages 3-13 of attachment). My garbage service is current (and has always been current) for the only cart provided by the City.
Staff Comments: Cameron cont'd city previously, eml'd RS with Q2 billing inquiry but rec'd no response. Forwarded eml to Chris req'ing info on Q2 billing asmnt. Staff recommends removing the assessment.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during April to June 2019. (File No. CG1903E3, Assessment No. 190139) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

RESOLVED, that pursuant to Chapte...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.