Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 19-512    Version: Name: 752 CARROLL AVENUE
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 9/18/2019
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 752 CARROLL AVENUE. (File No. CRT1909A, Assessment No. 198214)
Sponsors: Dai Thao
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 752 Carroll Ave.Fee Invoice.4-4-19.pdf, 2. 752 Carroll Ave.Final Invoice.4-11-19.pdf
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 752 CARROLL AVENUE. (File No. CRT1909A, Assessment No. 198214)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 6/4/19; referred to 9/3/19
Time of LH: 10 a.m.
Date of CPH: Original date 7/17/19; 9/18/19

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $1089
Service Charge: $157
Total Assessment: $1246
Gold Card Returned by: James Cannon (email from Mai Vang)
Type of Order/Fee: FC of O, Duplex
Nuisance: Unpaid FC of O fees
Date of Orders: Appointment letters: 7/6, 7/14 and 7/25/17. Correction letters: 8/24, 9/26 and 11/22/17, 3/21,4/10,6/18,8/23 and 10/17/2018. Revocation letters: 11/9 and 12/4/2018.
Compliance Date: 12/31/2018
Billing Dates: 1/4, 2/4 and 2/11/2018
Returned Mail?: No
Comments: First appointment letter sent to: LPM Companies. Next two appointment letters, nine correction letters and one revocation letter sent to PO at 752 Carroll. Second revocation letter and first bill sent to PO at 2900 4th St SE Apt 639 Minneapolis. Second bill sent to PO at 5932 Elliot Ave. Minneapolis.
History of Orders on Property: Legislative appeal 10/9/18 by PO and 11/27/18 by SMRLS for tenant.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Fire Certificate of Occupancy fees billed during December 13, 2018 to January 11, 2019. (File No. CRT1909A, Assessment No. 198214) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

RESOLVED, t...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.