Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 19-514    Version: Name: 1680 MARSHALL AVE
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 9/11/2019
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1680 MARSHALL AVENUE. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101)
Sponsors: Mitra Jalali Nelson
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 4
Attachments: 1. 1680 Marshall Ave.Invoices & Emails & Other docs.7.8.19
Related files: RLH AR 19-74
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1680 MARSHALL AVENUE. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 7/11/2019
Time of LH: 9:00 AM
Date of CPH: 9/11/2019

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Casey
Cost: $37.09
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Garbage Service; Jan 1 - Mar 31 2019
Garbage Hauler: Advanced Disposal
Type of Order/Fee: Garbage Hauling
Billing Time Period: 4th Quarter 2018 (Oct 1 - Dec 31)
Invoice Date(s):
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): The initial response to my complaint indicates I received a credit for $37.09 on my following bill, however, I am not seeing that this credit exists. Also, I received a bill from Advanced Disposal indicating the new amount to pay. I paid that amount and despite this credit, I am still getting charged for a higher level of service than I actually received.

Staff Comments: Response from Advanced Disposal- RDU should have paid the Q1 billing in full in the amount of $294.60. They paid $257.51 leaving a balance due of $37.09 which was sent to the city for collection. The RDU recieved the service level credit on the Q2 billing. This amount is owed.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2019. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.