Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 19-541    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 9/11/2019
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 565 DAYTON AVENUE. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101)
Sponsors: Dai Thao
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 565 Dayton Ave.January Notice of Non-Payment.1-31-19, 2. 565 Dayton Ave.March Notice of Non-Payment.3-31-19
Related files: RLH AR 19-74
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 565 DAYTON AVENUE. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 7/18/19
Time of LH: 11:15 AM
Date of CPH: 9/11/19

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Rebecca John
Cost: $4.06
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Garbage Service; Jan 1 - Mar 31 2019
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: 1st Quarter of 2019
Invoice Date(s): Jan - 1/31/19, Feb - Missing, Mar - 3/31/19
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?: [hauler or city address and notice issues]
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): when the garbage program started, she did not received notice, didn’t know about the contract, but did signed up for the cart size. When Republic bill came, she didn’t know anything about Republic so she thought it was junk mail. Called Republic afterward and they agreed to remove the late fee but didn’t and sent to the City. Called the City couple times, as well. Wants late fee removed.
Staff Comments: The Quarter 1 2019 bill was sent out on 1/5/19. The due date for the Quarter 1 2019 bill was 1/25/19. The property owner did not pay the bill by the due date. The property owner owes the late fee.

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2019. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially sa...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.