Saint Paul logo
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 16-417    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 10/5/2016
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 1661 IDAHO AVENUE EAST. (File No. J1612E, Assessment No. 168322)
Sponsors: Dan Bostrom
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 6
Attachments: 1. 1661 Idaho Ave E.EC Letter & Bill 4-15-16, 2. 1661 Idaho Ave E.CN 3-24-16
Related files: RLH AR 16-69
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 1661 IDAHO AVENUE EAST. (File No. J1612E, Assessment No. 168322)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: September 6, 2016
Date of CPH: October 5, 2016

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $120
Service Charge: $35
Total Assessment: $155
Gold Card Returned by: Mayura Lee
Type of Order/Fee: Excessive consumption fees
Nuisance: Failure to maintain exterior of property
Date of Orders: March 24, 2016
Compliance Date: April 14, 2016
Re-Check Date: April 14, 2016
Date Work Done: June 17, 2016
Work Order #: 16-021105 Inv#: 1235478
Returned Mail?: NO
Comments: A CN was issued on 3/24/16 to install address numbers on the garage and to elevate a wood pile off the ground in the backyard. Property was re-inspected on 4/14/16 and inspector issued EC for non-compliance. SA was also issued on 4/14/16 to remove a storm door and other refuse from the backyard; was in compliance upon re-inspection. Property was re-inspected on 5/16/16 and was still not in compliance on the address numbers on the garage. Inspector issued another CN and EC on 5/17/16. Property was re-inspected on 6/17/16 and was found to be in compliance; inspector then cancelled the EC issued on 5/17/16; closed file.

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection/Abatement services billed during March 31 to May 6, 2016. (File No. J1612E, Assessment No. 168322) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considere...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.