Saint Paul logo
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RLH TA 16-407    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 10/5/2016
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 1107 CASE AVENUE. (File No. J1612E, Assessment No. 168322)
Sponsors: Dan Bostrom
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 6
Attachments: 1. 1107 Case Ave.EC Bill 4-27-16, 2. 1107 Case Ave.SA 4-18-16, 3. 1107 Case Ave.Photos 4-27-16
Related files: RLH AR 16-69
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 1107 CASE AVENUE. (File No. J1612E, Assessment No. 168322)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: September 6, 2016
Date of CPH: October 5, 2016

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $120
Service Charge: $35
Total Assessment: $155
Gold Card Returned by: Sarah Castrejon
Type of Order/Fee: Excessive consumption fees
Nuisance: Failure to maintain exterior of property
Date of Orders: April 18, 2016
Compliance Date: April 25, 2016
Re-Check Date: April 27, 2016
Date Work Done: May 9, 2016 re-inspected and work had been done
Work Order #: 16-027116 Inv#: 1237539
Returned Mail?: NO
Comments: EC issued for failure to complete work by the compliance date.
History of Orders on Property: Complaint of burning in the backyard was also received on 4/14/16; fire inspector did not find any evidence of burning; PO was provided sheet on recreational burning requirements. Complaint was received on 3/11/16 of discarded mattress; property was inspected, however, inspector failed to send a summary abatement order; work order was issued on 3/17/16 with work being done by Parks on 3/17/16.

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection/Abatement services billed during March 31 to May 6, 2016. (File No. J1612E, Assessment No. 168322) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It


Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.