Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 16-323    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/17/2016
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 692 CHARLES AVENUE (File No. J1611G, Assessment No. 168711).
Sponsors: Dai Thao
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 692 Charles Ave.Hauler Order.3-24-16, 2. 692 Charles Ave.Photos.4-1-16
Related files: RLH AR 16-51
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 692 CHARLES AVENUE (File No. J1611G, Assessment No. 168711).

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 7-5-16
Date of CPH: 8-17-16

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $150
Service Charge: $160
Total Assessment: $310
Gold Card Returned by: DAVID YOUMANS
Type of Order/Fee: HAULER ORDER
Nuisance: FAILURE TO HAVE TRASH SERVICE
Date of Orders: 3-24-16
Compliance Date: 3-31-16
Re-Check Date: 4-1-16
Date Work Done: 2 WEEKS OF SERVICE. DROP OFF FEE OF $50 AND 2 WEEKS OF SERVICE AND CODE ENFORCEMENT FEE
Work Order #: 16-023449 4/6/2016 & 16-024461 4/6/2016
Returned Mail?: NO
Comments: CONFIRMED NO SERICE WITH EAST METRO. HAULER SENT.
Garbage Hauler (Summary Abatement) DSI Code Enforcement Reinspection 04/01/2016: *Compliance Recheck - No trash service. East Metro was cancelled, per East Metro. HO said they have Coolidge, but in calling Collidge/Advanced - they have no service. HO has own unmarked ballel in yard. Photo.
Garbage Hauler (-Work Order - Hauler) 04/06/2016: Close-Abated - Now has weekly service with Advanced. City pick-up stopped. When Hauler WO sent on 04/01/16 Coolidge/Advanced said they had no service. Photo from compliance date of 03/21/16 shows overflowing unmarked container.
arbage Hauler (Abated)

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Trash Hauling services during April 6 to 27, 2016. (File No. J1611G, Assessment No. 168711) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.