Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 16-150    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 4/6/2016
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 1863 AMES AVENUE. (File No. J1605E3, Assessment No. 168317)
Sponsors: Dan Bostrom
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 6
Attachments: 1. 1863 Ames Ave.Summary Abatement Order.9-17-15, 2. 1863 Ames Ave.Photos.9-23-15, 3. 1863 Ames Ave.PAEC Ltr.9-28-15
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 1863 AMES AVENUE. (File No. J1605E3, Assessment No. 168317)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 3/15/16
Date of CPH: 4/6/16

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $120.00

Service Charge: $35.00

Total Assessment: $155.00

Gold Card Returned by: Tarryl Olson

Type of Order/Fee: Excessive Consumption

Nuisance: Summary abatement for mattress/headboard leaning up against garage door.

Date of Orders: September 17, 2015

Compliance Date: September 23, 2015

Re-Check Date: September 23, 2015 - condition was not abated

Date Work Done: September 25, 2015 - done by Parks, In order to recover city cost for the reinspection, a $120.00 was assessed. The $120.00 was not paid and it went to assessment. A PAEC letter was sent on September 28, 2015.

Work Order #: 15-160221, Inv# 1200544

Returned Mail?: No. Mails were sent to Olson Property Investments, LLC, 1770 Breecher Dr, St Paul MN 55122 & Occupant.

Comments: This was referred back by Council on March 2, 2016. DSI staff rec'd deleting the assessment. It shouldn't have been EC because the work was done by Parks.

History of Orders on Property:

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Inspection/Abatement services billed from August 24 to September 25, 2015. (File No. J1605E3, Assessment No. 168317) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.