Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 15-447    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 1/6/2016
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 118 MORTON AVENUE WEST (File No. J1601E, Assessment No. 168300).
Sponsors: Dave Thune
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 2
Attachments: 1. 118 Morton Ave W.EC Bill 4-24-15, 2. 118 Morton Ave W.Correction Notice 4-15-15, 3. 118 Morton Ave W.Correction Notice 5-6-15, 4. 118 Morton St W.Photo.4-24-15
Related files: RLH AR 15-68
Title

Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 118 MORTON AVENUE WEST (File No. J1601E, Assessment No. 168300).

Hearing Date(s)

Date of LH:  September 1, 2015

Date of CPH:  January 6, 2016

Tax Assessment Worksheet

Cost:  $120

Service Charge:  $35

Total Assessment:  $155

Gold Card Returned by:  Francisco Trejo

Type of Order/Fee:  Excessive consumption fees

Nuisance:  Failure to maintain exterior of property

Date of Orders:   April 15, 2014

Compliance Date:  April 24, 2014

Re-Check Date:  April 24, 2015

Work Order #: 15-026972   Inv#:  1171475

Returned Mail?:  NO

Comments:  Inspector issued a correction notice on 4/15/15 for a scooter parked in the front yard. Property was re-inspected on 4/24/15 and the scooter remained parked in front yard; inspector issued a bill for excessive consumption.  Property was re-inspected on 5/6/15 and found the scooter parked in the side yard; inspector re-issued a correction notice due to possible misinterpretation of original orders. Property was re-inspected on 5/13/15 and the scooter was parked in the street. File closed.

Body

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement servies billed during April 24 to May 21, 2015. (File No. J1601E, Assessment No. 168300) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

RESOLVED, that pursuant to ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.