Saint Paul logo
File #: RES 12-967    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 5/23/2012
Title: Opposing the proposed constitutional amendment to restrict the voting rights of Minnesotans by mandating government-issued documents as a condition for voting.
Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen, Kathy Lantry, Russ Stark
Title
Opposing the proposed constitutional amendment to restrict the voting rights of Minnesotans by mandating government-issued documents as a condition for voting.

Body
Whereas the right to vote is fundamental to democracy in America; and

Whereas government has a duty to prevent unnecessary bureaucratic barriers that impair the voting rights of Americans; and

Whereas Minnesota has been the national leader in voter participation for the past four decades; and

Whereas Minnesota is widely acknowledged to have the best system for administering elections in the United States; and

Whereas the high level of accuracy and integrity of the election system in Minnesota has been confirmed by statewide recounts in 2008 and 2010; and

Whereas the Minnesota Legislature has nonetheless voted to place a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot to restrict the voting rights of all Minnesotans by mandating possession of a government-issued document to vote; and

Whereas the proposed constitutional amendment would deny the right to vote to any eligible voter who is not able to provide a mandated government-issued document; and

Whereas many eligible voters would find it difficult or impossible to obtain the necessary government-issued documents that would be required by the proposed amendment; and

Whereas the costs that many voters would be forced to bear to obtain the necessary government-issued documents would effectively constitute a poll tax on those voters; and

Whereas proven instances of violations of the Minnesota election law consist of isolated, infrequent acts committed by a handful of individuals who would not be deterred by the proposed amendment; and

Whereas the proposed amendment would impose a costly, unnecessary and ineffective system of provisional voting on Minnesota voters; and

Whereas the costs of implementing the provisions of the proposed amendment would fall almost exclusively on local government and would mandate an increase in prope...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.