Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 20-368    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/19/2020
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 564 SIMPSON STREET. (File No. CRT2011, Assessment No. 208210)
Sponsors: Mitra Jalali
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 4
Attachments: 1. 564 Simpson St.fee invoice.1-27-20.pdf, 2. 564 Simpson St.final invoice.2-26-20.pdf
Related files: RLH AR 20-100
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 564 SIMPSON STREET. (File No. CRT2011, Assessment No. 208210)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 7/7/2020
Time of LH: 10 a.m.
Date of CPH: 8/19/2020

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $ 309
Service Charge: $157
Total Assessment: $ 466
Gold Card Returned by: email from Mai Vang
Type of Order/Fee: FCofO, SFD
Nuisance: unpaid FCofO fees
Date of Orders: Appointment letters: 5/22/19, 6/5/19, 6/27/19,7/17/19, 8/7/19, 10/10/19. Correction letters: 10/30/19 and 12/4/19.
Compliance Date: 1/23/20
Billing Dates: 1/27/20 and 2/26/20
Returned Mail?: No
Comments: Appointment letters dated 5/22, 6/5, 6/27, and 7/17/19 sent to Alan Peterson. Management Matrix Inc. 366 Prior Ave N Ste 205 St Paul, MN 55104. Appointment letters dated 8/7 and 10/10/19 and Correction letters dated 10/30 and 12/4/19 sent to Alan Peterson. Management Matrix, Inc. 902 6th St E St Paul, MN 55106. Resp. Party updated by inspector on 1/23/20. Both Billings sent to RP: Lyman Opie 60 Magazine St Cambridge, MA 02139
History of Orders on Property: Two $74 no entry fees have been deleted before sending to assessments as we cannot assess no entry fees.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Fire Certificate of Occupancy fees billed during January 8 to February 15, 2020 . (File No. CRT2011, Assessment No. 208210) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.