Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH AR 17-10    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Assessment Roll Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 3/15/2017
Title: Ratifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during August 15 to September 23, 2016. (File No. J1704E, Assessment No. 178303)
Sponsors: Russ Stark
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 4
Attachments: 1. Assessment Roll
Related files: RLH TA 17-32, RLH TA 17-44, RLH TA 17-31, RLH TA 17-34

Title

Ratifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during August 15 to September 23, 2016. (File No. J1704E, Assessment No. 178303)

 

Body

WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council in Council File RES 16-2225 accepted the Report of Completion for Excessive Use of Inspections or Abatement Services for the Property Code Violations billed during the time period of August 15 to September 23, 2016; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed the assessment roll, considered appeals of affected property owners and developed recommendations for City Council with respect to those assessments; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 15, 2017 to consider ratification of the assessment roll; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council considered and found satisfactory the assessment of benefits, costs and expenses for the services provided; now, therefore be it

 

RESOLVED, that, pursuant to Chapter 14 of the City Charter and Chapter 60 of the Administrative Code, the assessments are hereby in all respects ratified with the exception of the following amendments which will be considered separately:

 

                     RLH TA 17-44:  1053 Beech Street;

                     RLH TA 17-32:  916 Iglehart Avenue;

                     RLH TA 17-31:  898 Sixth Street East;

                     RLH TA 17-34:  35 Stevens Street East; and be it further

 

RESOLVED, that the assessments be payable in one (1) installment, unless specified by the Legislative Hearing Officer’s recommended amendments.

Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.