Legislation Details

File #: RLH TA 26-133    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Mayor's Office
In control: City Council
Final action: 6/17/2026
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1397 HEWITT AVENUE. (File No. CG25Q4B4, Assessment No. 260144)
Sponsors: Molly Coleman
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 4
Attachments: 1. 1397 Hewitt Avenue.Cart Sharing Request.#1839032, 2. 1397 Hewitt Avenue.Q1 2026 Adjsutment.#1860884, 3. 1397 Hewitt Avenue.Q4 Legislative Hearing.Cart Size.#1868421
Related files: RLH AR 26-39
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1397 HEWITT AVENUE. (File No. CG25Q4B4, Assessment No. 260144)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 06/16/2026
Time of LH: 9:00 am
Date of CPH: 06/17/2026

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Mary C Gallagher
Cost: $165.38
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Unpaid Garbage Bill; October 1, 2025-December 31, 2025
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: Quarter 4 (October - December) 2025
Invoice Date(s): October 1, 2025-December 31, 2025
Garbage Hauler: FCC Environmental
Service Level: 35 gallon, weekly service; 35 gallon, biweekly service
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): PO was charged for two 35 gallon carts, but there was one 35 gallon cart with weekly service and one 35 gallon cart with every other week service at the property.
Staff Comments: When this PO requested enrollment to our Cart Sharing program, it was discovered that we are billing them for two small carts but there is actually one small cart with weekly service and one small cart with biweekly service. Staff recommends reducing Q4 2025 assessment to $141.16

Body
AMENDED 6/17/2026

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with the Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2025. (File No. CG25Q4B4, Assessment No. 260144) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, ...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.