Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 24-421    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 11/6/2024
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 75 MARYLAND AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG2403A1, Assessment No. 240115)
Sponsors: HwaJeong Kim
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 5
Attachments: 1. 75 Maryland Ave E.Assessment Inquiry.10-17-2024, 2. 75 Maryland Ave E.Supplemental Information.10-17-2024
Related files: RLH TA 22-376, RLH TA 24-435, RLH TA 24-433, RLH TA 24-434, RLH AR 24-94
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 75 MARYLAND AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG2403A1, Assessment No. 240115)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 10/22/2024
Time of LH: 3:00 pm
Date of CPH: 11/06/2024

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Postcard Returned by: Jen McDonough
Cost: $388.29
Hauling Service(s) Provided: Unpaid Garbage Bill; (April 1 - June 30)
Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling
Billing Time Period: Quarter 2 (April - June) 2024
Invoice Date(s): (April 1 - June 30)
Garbage Hauler: Waste Management
Service Level: 64 Gallon
Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:
Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): WM has been triple billing a Single Family home that has only 1 - 64 gallon cart.
Staff Comments: In October 2022, a garbage assessment file was entered and Waste Management was made aware of the triple billing happening at this property. WM requested the Q2 2022 assessment of $333.12 to be reduced to $96.95 (the amount for 1 -64 gallon cart in 2022). However, WM did not remedy the mistake in their system, resulting in the property being continually assessed each quarter for 3 - 64 galloon carts. Staff recommends reducing.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with the Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during April to June 2024. (File No. CG2403A1, Assessment No. 240115) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

RESOLVED, that purs...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.