Title
Directing the Department of Safety and Inspections to proceed with adverse action and the imposition of a $1000 matrix penalty against D & L Tobacco LLC d/b/a D & L Tobacco (License ID #20210002137) for the premises located at 626 Larpenteur Avenue West STE A.
Body
WHEREAS, the Tobacco Products Shop license (“License”) held by D & L Tobacco LLC d/b/a D & L Tobacco under (License ID #20210002137) for the premises located at 626 Larpenteur Avenue West STE A., in Saint Paul (“Licensed Premises”), which is owned by Raees Chohan and Raymond Smith (“Licensees”) was the subject of adverse action pursuant to an July 22, 2025, Notice of Violation and Request for Imposition of $1000 Matrix Penalty (“Notice”) (Exhibit # 1) in which the Department of Safety and Inspections (“Department”) provided notice to the Licensee of its intent to request imposition of a $1000 matrix penalty because the Licensee failed a second Tobacco Underage Buyers compliance Check within a 24 month period on May 9, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Notice detailed that on May 9, 2025, at 1:02 p.m. DSI Inspector, Luis Sanchez-Panadero conducted a Tobacco Underage Buyers Compliance Check at the Licensed Premises. As part of the Tobacco Underage Buyers Compliance Check, an eighteen-year-old male, retained by DSI to perform underage compliance checks, entered the Licensed Premises to purchase cigarettes. He was not asked to show his identification nor was he asked of his age. Nevertheless, the clerk sold him a Geek Bar Pulse Vape; and
WHEREAS, On May 15, 2025, a letter was sent to D & L Tobacco, Raees Chohan, and to Amna Kiran, from DSI Inspector, Joseph Voyda. The letter informed the Licensee that DSI had recently conducted a State mandated annual inspection and the person under the age of 21, hired by DSI to conduct the check was successfully able to purchase cigarettes; and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2025, Licensee, Mr. Raymond Smith visited DSI’s office claiming there was a mistake, and that the violation took place at an adjacent convenience store called “Kitty’s Corner”. Licensing Manager, Eric Hudak advised an underage buyer was escorted into D & L Tobacco making such a mistake unlikely to have occurred; and
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2025, Licensee Mr. Raymond Smith called DSI and was very adamant that the violation did not take place at his tobacco shop. DSI advised that he could prove his innocence by providing video footage from their CCTV system; and
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2025, DSI hand delivered a letter to the Licensee Mr. Raymond Smith requesting a copy of the video footage from all camera views for the period of Friday, May 9, 2025, from 12:45 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. Licensee was to provide a copy of the video footage no later than Thursday, May 29, 2025, at 4:00 p.m., which they failed to do; and
WHEREAS, the Notice laid out the basis for adverse action and the Legislative Code upon which the Department was relying as follows:
Saint Paul Legislative Code §310.01, defines Adverse Action as: “the revocation or suspension of a license, the imposition of conditions upon a license, the denial of an application of the grant, issuance or renewal of a license, the imposition of a fine, the assessment of the costs of a contested hearing, and any other disciplinary or unfavorable action taken with respect to a license, Licensee or applicant for a license. “Adverse action” includes any of the foregoing directed at one (1) or more licenses held by a Licensee at any location in the city. “Adverse action” also includes disapproval of licenses issued by the state under statutory provisions which permit the governing body to disapprove the issuance of the license.
Saint Paul Legislative Code §310.03 (m) 3 (1) (a) (Exhibit #2):
Saint Paul Legislative Code §310.14 makes a licensee responsible for a violation by a clerk, employee, manager or agent of a licensee:
“Any act or conduct by any clerk, employee, manager or agent of a licensee, or by any person providing entertainment or working for or on behalf of a licensee, whether compensates or not, which act or conduct takes place either on the licensed premises or in any parking lot or other area adjacent to (or under the lease or control of) the licensed premises, and which act or conduct violates any state or federal statutes or regulations, or any city ordinance, must be considered to be and treated as the act of conduct of the licensee for the purpose of adverse action against all or any of the licenses held by such licensee. To the extent this section is in conflict with sections 409.14 and 410.09 of the Legislative Code, this section must be controlling and prevail; but must not otherwise amend, alter or affect such sections.”
Saint Paul Legislative Code §324.07(i) prohibits the sale of tobacco products to a person under 21:
“No holder of a license issued under this chapter, nor any employee or agent of same may sell tobacco products to a person under the age of twenty-one (21) years. Sale to persons under the age of twenty-one (21) years is prohibited.”
Minnesota Statute §461.12 Subd. 2 also sets a minimum statutory penalty for the sale of tobacco to an underage person:
“If a licensee or employee of a licensee sells, gives, or otherwise furnishes tobacco, tobacco-related devices, electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products to a person under the age of 21 years, or violates any other provision of this chapter, the licensee shall be charged an administrative penalty of $300 for the first violation. An administrative penalty of $600 must be imposed for a second violation at the same location within 36 months after the initial violation. For a third or any subsequent violation at the same location within 36 months after the initial violation, an administrative penalty of $1,000 must be imposed, and the licensee’s authority to sell tobacco, tobacco-related devices, electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products at that location must be suspended for not less than seven days and may be revoked. No suspension, revocation, or other penalty may take effect until the licensee has received notice, served personally or by mail, of the alleged violation and an opportunity for a hearing before a person authorized by the licensing authority to conduct the hearing. A decision that a violation has occurred must be in writing.”
WHEREAS, the Licensee failed their first Tobacco Underage Buyer Compliance Check on March 20, 2024, and on June 26 2024 licensee paid their $500 fine associated with their first violation; and
WHEREAS, because the Licensee had failed a second Tobacco Underage Buyer Compliance Check within a 24 month period, the Department of Safety and Inspections recommended a $1000 matrix penalty based on Saint Paul Legislative Code §310.01, §310.03 (m) 3 (1) (a), §310.14, §324.07(i), and Minnesota Statute §461.12 Subd. 2.; and
WHEREAS, the Notice laid out options for the Licensee:
“You have four (4) options on how to proceed:
1. If you do not contest the imposition of the proposed adverse action, you may do nothing. If I have not heard from you by August 1, 2025, I will presume that you have chosen not to contest the proposed adverse action and the matter will be placed on the City Council Consent agenda for imposition of the $1000 matrix penalty.
2. You can pay the $1000 matrix penalty. If this is your choice, you should make payment directly to the Department of Safety and Inspections, at 375 Jackson Street, Ste. 220, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1806 no later than August 1, 2025, please contact the Department immediately.
3. If you wish to admit the facts but you contest the $1000 matrix penalty, you may have a hearing before the Saint Paul City Council. You will need to send me a letter with a statement admitting to the facts and requesting a Council hearing no later than August 1, 2025, the matter will then be scheduled before the City Council to determine whether to impose the $1000 matrix penalty. You will have an opportunity to appear before the Council and make a statement on your own behalf.
4. If you dispute the facts outlined above, you may request a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). You will need to send me a letter disputing the facts and requesting an administrative hearing no later than August 1, 2025. At that hearing both you and the City will appear and present witnesses, evidence and cross-examine each other's witnesses. After receipt of the ALJ’s report (usually within 30 days), a hearing will need to be scheduled. At that time, the City Council will decide whether to adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s report and recommendation.
WHEREAS, the Notice was sent to the licensee on July 22, 2025, providing that the Licensee respond by August 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on August 6, 2025, the City Attorney’s Office contacted the Department of Safety and Inspections to confirm whether payment of the $1000 matrix penalty was received and was informed that they have not heard from the Licensee/or received payment; and
WHEREAS, the Notice stated if the Licensee failed to provide payment of the $1000 matrix penalty to the Department of Safety and Inspections by August 1, 2025, that the matter would be placed on the City Council Agenda to impose the recommended penalty; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, the $1000 matrix penalty is hereby imposed on the Tobacco Products Shop license held by D & L Tobacco LLC d/b/a D & L Tobacco, (License ID #20210002137) for the premises located at 626 Larpenteur Avenue West STE A., Saint Paul, MN 55113, Licensee is ordered to pay the $1000 matrix penalty fee to the Department of Safety and Inspections in violation of Saint Paul Legislative Codes §310.01, §310.03 (m) 3 (1) (a), §310.14, §324.07(i), and Minnesota Statute §461.12 Subd. 2.