Adopted
FOR DISCUSSION
Approving adverse action against the Liquor on Sale - 101 - 189 seats, Liquor
on Sale - Sunday, Liquor on Sale - 2AM Closing, Liquor - Outdoor Service
Area - Patio, and Entertainment B License held by RAS Ethiopian Bar &
Restaurant LLC d/b/a RAS Restaurant & Lounge (License ID #20100000062)
at 2516 7th Street West.
10
Council President Brendmoen said the City Attorney's office would be giving a brief
update.
Deputy City Attorney Adam Niblick gave a background update, noting the people in the
audience. Laid out that whatever the Council decides, the license holder can seek
action at the Court of Appeals. Also said that this was not a public hearing.
Councilmember Prince noted the missed deadlines by the license holder and asked
Niblick if that meant the Council's options were limited, and that the opportunity to
have an administrative law judge hear the case had passed.
Niblick stated that this was the only option procedurally for the Council, and also
stated that the opportunity to bring this before an administrative law judge had passed.
Brendmoen said the next step for the license holder would be the Court of Appeals.
Niblick echoed the statement of Brendmoen, if the adverse action were to pass.
Councilmember Thao asked if there had been an appeal already.
Niblick stated that DSI gave background for the violations to the license holder.
Stated that the license holder was given a number of options, including a hearing
before an administrative law judge. The license holder did not exercise that, causing
the current item to appear before the Council.
Thao clarified that DSI had conversations with the license holder.
Niblick gave background on communications to and from the license holder and
stating that there was due process.
Thao continued offering clarification based on Niblick's remarks.
Niblick continued offering clarification.
Councilmember Jalali acknowledged community members in the room and stated that
there was no going backward at this point. Acknowledged arguments for the adverse
action and reiterated that it was not possible for this to be a public hearing.
Niblick clarified that there were other avenues that the license holder did not exercise,
causing this issue to come before the Council.
Prince asked if the Council could send the matter to an administrative law judge.