incremental forfeiture not aligning with the 180-day grant of time. My amendment is to
align the two things.
Moermond: That would mean forfeiting the $2,500 every subsequent 45 days.
Johnson: I move that amendment.
Council President Noecker: So, forfeit $2,500 and another $2,500 every 45 days until
the work completes?
Councilmember Yang: I support that.
Adopted (forfeit $2,500 and forfeit remaining deposit by $2,500 every 45 days)
7 -
0
Yea:
Nay:
Councilmember Noecker, Councilmember Yang, Councilmember Kim,
Councilmember Bowie, Councilmember Jost, Councilmember Johnson and
Councilmember Coleman
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 777 OHIO
STREET. (File No. J2602A, Assessment No. 268503)
46
Referred to October 6, 2026 Legislative Hearing.
Jessica Klasen, property representative, appeared in person.
Adam Lind, relative of property representative, appeared in person.
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This is an assessment for an interior
abatement to repair a sewer line. The property was referred by Police to the
Department of Safety and Inspections (DSI) for having dangerous conditions on March
8, 2026. DSI staff responded the next day. An inspection occurred not long after, but
DSI was denied access to the house. The Police referred stated that the woman was
living alone with stage 4 cancer, and there was black mold and sewage backing up to
create nonlivable conditions. She couldn't afford to fix her plumbing and couldn't flush
her toilets for weeks.
An outside contractor did work in April to clear the sewer line. The $6,868 charge is for
that work, which includes fees. The contractor said it was the worst sewer backup
they'd ever seen involving nonflushable products. There were two no-show Legislative
Hearings on this, where we made 5 phone calls to the property representative. The
owner passed away in May. Information has been attached to the file alleging that the
sewer line was in bad condition and that the city contractor did the job incorrectly. The
testifier today can correct me on that if I'm wrong. There is also a statement attached
from a plumber who had similar comments.
The House Calls program provided two large dumpsters to remove items from the
house. I don't know if the DSI inspector said House Calls would be cleaning the floor,
but it's also alleged that that did not happen. I need more information, and I have no
hearing fall back on, so my recommendation is to ratify the assessment and make it
payable over one year. The City did this to allow the owner to stay in their home for
their hospice care.
Council President Noecker: What are the formal circumstances for us to do an interior
abatement and assess the cost for that?
Moermond: DSI needs to determine that it is a public nuisance. Past examples include
rat and cockroach infestations that impact neighboring properties. The issue here was
probably the spread of germs in a small area, due to the sewage. The owner also
wanted to do this work.