correction order. There were plumbing issues, holes, and walls needing repainting.
Some issues are significant, but didn't rise to the level of condemnation. The appellant
spoke during the hearing about frustrations with their landlord, Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), and the Department of Safety and Inspections (DSI). According
to our records, we have no logged complaints about this property. All that's before you
today are the orders from June 9. Hearing Officer Moermond's recommendation is
grant to August 7, 2026 for compliance. The appellant has pursued other avenues with
other jurisdictions to deal with their concerns. The City doesn't have jurisdiction over
those avenues.
Council President Noecker: What are the orders in need of correction?
Zimny: The report by Supervisor Keith Demarest has findings including the kitchen
drain line dripping, upstairs bathtub overflowing through the ceiling, heat deflector
shield removed from kitchen heater, removed smoke alarms in the kitchen and
basement as the largest concern, some holes and repairs needed in the upstairs
vanity, bubbling in upstairs ceiling, repainting needed throughout, condensation on
walls, and a new vent fan upstairs.
Noecker: Do these orders go to the tenant or property owner?
Zimny: The property owner is ultimately responsible for the repairs.
Noecker: I'm trying to understand the tenant's appeal if there's no vacate order.
Zimny: The tenant has continued frustration with the landlord not addressing these
issues. This started in February 2026. There were multiple visits to the property with
orders issued and nothing done. New orders were on February 18, March 5, April 9, and
May 8. Nothing ever recorded being done.
Noecker: The tenant is appealing the orders?
Zimny: Yes. He perhaps disagrees with the time given. I will let him speak to that.
Noecker: The responsibility is on the property owner, though.
Zimny: Correct.
Ambe McKenzie: That wasn't correct. That isn't why I'm here. My issue is that you,
Noecker, had already visited the property in April 2025. There was $3.8 million worth of
damages. This is just like Heritage Park in North Minneapolis. My issue is also with
Maintenance Property Solutions. I have video of them stealing some of the materials I
took from my house in Saint Paul to North Minneapolis Heritage Park. These guys
targeted us, went into the garage, and stole from us. They also stole from the (not
audible) home, which is how I know they steal. They come in and say they will repair,
say, the exhaust fan. The exhaust fan is still missing. It was taken out in July. June
was when I moved in. I was coached out of my place in April when the check from
DOGE for that property was denied fro $3.8 million in damages. They knew that when
they called me, a vulnerable adult with a vulnerable child, to this property with a fraud
housing company and this company, Vista. They used that to pay all this money but
won't repair anything. My daughter fell during Zoom court. The judge hurried up and
dismissed my case. This was caught on camera. They dismissed it with prejudice just
because he couldn't hear me on Zoom. I'm here because the Minnesota Public
Housing Authority (MPHA) told me at the Heritage Park meeting that they don't pay for
properties with this type of damage. Yet we're all black and they're paying for it. How
does that work? I've brought up laws. Nothing is being respected. No one from the
property wants to come here or to court because of the way I'm being retaliated