7 -
0
Yea:
Nay:
Councilmember Noecker, Councilmember Yang, Councilmember Kim,
Councilmember Bowie, Councilmember Jost, Councilmember Johnson and
Councilmember Privratsky
LEGISLATIVE HEARING DISCUSSION ITEM
Amending Council File RLH AR 25-34 to ratify the assessment for Collection
25
of Vacant Building Registration fees billed during March 11 to October 17,
2024 at 1003 ARCADE STREET. (File No. VB2508, Assessment No. 258807)
Assessment ratified and made payable over 5 years.
Ia Lee, owner, appeared by phone
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This is an appealed vacant building fee
that has already been ratified. I’m bring items like this back when there is reason to
believe there may have been a City error. A person can file in district court to bring
that to the attention of the City Attorney's Office. In this case, we can look at it but still
keep that option available to them. What gave me pause was the address that the
notice was sent to. I wanted to verify if the notice went to where it should have gone in
the timing that it should have gone. The fee period is from September 2024 to
September 2025. When the owner, Ia Lee, first got the letter, she appealed the
registration notice. The address was correct at that time. Council granted a 90-day
waiver. There were questions then about address changes during Legislative Hearings
on that subject. Ramsey County updated the address changes the day after Council
had made its decision. So, notice did go to the correct place. The second layer of this
had to do with the owner not thinking it was doable to complete the work in under three
months. The waiver is just that, a waiver. If work is not completed then, they are
responsible for the whole fee. In this case, Lee got the Fire Certificate of Occupancy
(FCO) last week. That puts us 9-10 months into the fee period. I can’t find an
argument for a reduction, given the notice being properly done and the time it took to
complete the work. I don’t see extenuating circumstances. Lee stated that she thinks
notices should have been emailed. City Departments use US Mail. I see nothing to
make me recommend a reduction or deletion. If you decide to make changes, we can
pass a new resolution.
Council President Noecker: Could you clarify the time period? The file says different
dates than what you mentioned.
Moermond: That title is the assessment roll for fees billed during that period. This fee
appeared on that assessment roll and was billed during that window you see in the title.
Councilmember Johnson: Were no permits pulled until last week?
Moermond: The permits pulled in the last fall and also in March, April, and June. They
were all finaled in mid June and the FCO was issued June 23.
Johnson: Could you restate your recommendation?
Moermond: To not amend the already ratified assessment roll, which includes
ratification of this assessment.
Ia Lee: I want to be clear that I was not aware of mail coming to the building or to me
at my home address. I don’t know which department is responsible for that. The only
reason I found out about this is when I went into the office last month to pay property