Bowie moved to close the public hearing. Approved 5-0.
Bowie: I move Moermond's recommendation.
Jalali: I support that motion.
Adopted
5 -
0
Yea:
Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember Yang, Councilmember Bowie,
Councilmember Jost and Councilmember Johnson
Nay:
2 - Councilmember Noecker and Councilmember Kim
Absent:
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2130 IVY
AVENUE EAST. (File No. VB2503, Assessment No. 258802) (Public hearing
closed and laid over from February 5, 2025)
42
Laid over for one week.
Julie Walters-Lee, owner, appeared in person
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This is a tax assessment for a vacant
building fee. The Council has had this property in front of it regarding the vacant
building registration on two occasions. You gave a 90-day waiver on the fee and then
there was a further extension granted to that waiver. There was some specific language
about circumstances under which the vacant building fee would be prorated. I would
have read the language in a different way than the appellant did, but I think that it was
sufficiently ambiguous that I will ere on the side of the appellant. She provided
calculations of what she believes that the vacant building assessment should be, and
she provided some good background on that. My recommendation before you is what
the appellant's request was, which is a reduction from $5,077 to $2,815. She
purchased the property in November and the assessment had not yet been noticed, as
it was simply a pending assessment. When you close on a property, the assessments
need to be dealt with. The title company wanted to clean this up and so either the
seller or the buyer will pick up the cost of the assessment, whatever their agreement
is. Because the assessment hadn't yet been ratified by the City Council, the money for
it was escrowed. The title company did actually pay the assessment, and so it has
been paid at the $5,077 level. If the Council moves decreases the amount, per my
recommendation, the excess would be refunded to the title company and they would
deal with it from there.
Julie Walters-Lee: We purchased the property on June 3, 2024. We sold the property
on October 31, 2024. I appreciate the recommendation to decrease the assessment
from $5,077 to $2,815. I needed to appeal this because...I don't know if you guys have
my calculation in front of you or not. You do? Okay. The last line of the calculation
represents the 50% reduction regarding the resolution stating that if an unpaid
registered vacant building fee comes forward as a proposed assessment, if appealed,
it will be reduced fifty percent if the code compliance certificate is issued by
September 29, 2024. The vacant building fee did come forward as a proposed. The
letter I attached in my e-mail shows that the certificate of code compliance was issued
by that time, and I have appealed the fee. I appreciate the recommendation of $2,815,
which is what it was supposed to be, but there was a mistake made and nobody could
fix the mistake. It should have said that number on the website. It did not. Now I am
appealing in hopes that the amount will be reduced by 50% to be $1,407.62. Then my
refund would be around $3,600. If you're confused, I don't blame you, but this has
been ongoing for over a year. What happened was the VA (Veterans Affairs) owned it,