want to allow access because he wanted to do more cleaning, which is
understandable, but it was really important in my view to get a baseline so that the
Council had some place to begin with the property. The September 11 inspection
documented that the September 3 conditions continued to exist, in terms of
sanitation. They added items to the order as well. There was a strong odor of urine,
and sanitizing was needed throughout. There was also a smell of caustic chemicals
from the cleaning agents present, so breathing was extremely hard. One of our
inspectors went home because her face swelled up. Animal feces on the interior and
exterior were noted, as well as excessive combustible materials and inadequate
carbon monoxide alarms. There was a basement bedroom which did not have proper
exiting, a smoke detector alarm, or an egress window. Taking these things together,
my recommendation in the follow-up hearing on September 17 was grant until today
for the tall grass and weeds and garbage orders, and to recommend a vacate order
effective this coming Monday. It’s not a livable property, and this is a tight deadline.
The original orders on September 3 required vacation within 48 hours. If the
inspectors go in and find that the conditions have been improved, then they can lift
that condemnation on their own. The sanitation and air quality issues need to be dealt
with.
Another component I briefly talked about was animal hoarding. This property has
been used for an “animal rescue”, focusing on the “pocket pet” variety of animals. It
has been housing rabbits, hedgehogs, ferrets, rats, and guinea pigs. Additionally, the
family has 5 dogs, and 4 cats were reported. For the animals that are allowed, the
dogs and the cats, you can have up to 3. Dogs have to be licensed. If you go over 3,
you need a permit. A permit is going to require approval of the surrounding neighbors
and also an inspection to ensure safe, sanitary conditions for the animals present. It
seems unlikely that a permit would be granted, given the findings of these
inspections. It is also unlikely that this is a legal zoning use for property zoned H2.
This would be allowable in a traditional neighborhood zoning district, but not here.
The closest category this would fall into is an “animal boarding facility”. Finally, with
respect to permitting, the animal code provides that one animal in certain categories
can be maintained. Code states: “No person shall keep or permit more than one live
rabbit, mink, ferret, turkey, duck, goose, pigeon, or similar small animal or bird in any
dwelling unit or on the same lot or premise within the dwelling or other premises
within the city without a permit. This paragraph does not apply to any single dove or
other bird, chinchilla, hamster, gerbil, white rat, mouse, guinea pig maintained as a
pet.” Consulting with Molly Lunaris, the manager of Animal Control, she clarifies that
only one of that group of animals is allowed without a permit. I don’t see a way for
there to be resolution of the animal issue without there being complete reduction to
almost none of the pocket variety of animals. Animal control reported that the owners
have surrendered 2 guinea pigs, 23 rats, and 1 hamster to the MN Pocket Pet
Rescue and they moved their cats to a friend’s house while they clean. The rescue
did confirm the surrender of 1 hamster, 14 female rats (some pregnant), 9 male rats,
and 2 guinea pigs. They reported that several of the rats have respiratory infections,
are underweight, or have loose stool.
There is a cycle of unsafe living conditions here. I know from working in this field that
getting a house clean after being urine-soaked is a difficult task. It permeates deeply.
I can say the owners have taken action to reduce the fire risk of the house. That is
fantastic, but it does not take care of all the situation. My recommendation is to grant
to September 30 or that the property be vacated.
Councilmember Johnson: Can you provide an update related to the tall grass and
weeds and the garbage bags? When will the Department of Safety and Inspections
be able to conduct their follow-up?
Moermond: They will be going to inspect tomorrow, based on when we spoke this
afternoon.