They came out and dug two holes about 20 feet by 8 feet, however deep they needed
to get to the pipes. They let that sit there in the open for 3-4 weeks when it was raining,
and freezing. They didn't put any covers over the holes they made. That's where my
sewer line was. When they started doing construction, they came out, looked at my
sewer line, ran a camera through, and said it was good to go. After about halfway
through construction, a worker said they thought they might have hit something and
wanted to check it out. They checked and again said it was good to go. When they
came back a third time to check the same sewer line, they again said everything was
okay. I don't feel like I should be responsible for paying any of this because I had my
inspection done before I bought the house. Guys then came before, during, and after
construction and said again that everything was fine. But now we're here, so how did
this happen?
Councilmember Johnson moved to close the public hearing. Approved 7-0.
Johnson: Before Dallin joined the call, I was proposing an amendment to push forward
on repairs, but ensure photographs and documentation are taken before and after
making repairs, at or below grade, which could be included in any efforts to contest
responsibility. I want there to be full transparency. I will move that amended version.
Moermond: I just added the language, which would direct DSI to work with the City's
contractor to ensure thorough documentation of conditions at and below grade before
and after sewer line replacement or repair.
Jalali: I support that motion.
Adopted as amended
7 -
0
Yea:
Nay:
Councilmember Noecker, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember Yang,
Councilmember Kim, Councilmember Bowie, Councilmember Jost and
Councilmember Johnson
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 733 THOMAS
AVENUE. (File No. VB2401, Assessment No. 248800)
59
Assessment approved.
Also in attendance: Inho Chang, appellant
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This is an assessment for a Vacant
Building Fee. It is a fee covering two years. It originally entered the Vacant Building
Program on April 13, 2022, due to a fire, so it has been in it for 1 year and 9 months.
Legislative Code provides for a 90-day waiver on the fee after a fire, which it did
receive, taking them to July 13, 2022. Three more waivers were issued in 2022,
resulting in waiving an entire one-year period. The house was still not redeveloped, and
so the fee for the waived year was tacked on to the following year's fee. It is being
considered as one assessment for $5,075. My recommendation is to approve the
assessment. Given the complicated situation resulting from the waivers, I consulted
with my director and the City Attorney's Office, and they agree with my
recommendation.
Inho Chang: As I stated in an email, the fire did significant damage. I had trouble
finding a contractor because everyone was shorthanded. I was able to hire a general
building contractor and he was working on it, but then when I tried to get the electrical
contractor I couldn't find one until February 2023. That's beyond my control. Someone
then broke into the basement on June 23, 2023, where repair works was almost
completed. They stole the copper wire from the water heater, cut out electric wires, and