STREET (0 RAMSEY STREET). (File No. J2319A1, Assessment No.
238536)
Assessment reduced by half.
Also in attendance: Robert Rulon-Miller, appellant
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This is an assessment for property
cleanup. The order was issued on September 28, 2022 for cleanup of tents and other
items left behind by a homeless encampment. It was issued by a staffer with the
Homeless Assistance Response Team (HART) as a part of their work. The deadline
of October 5 was not met. Kamish Excavating was contracted to do the work on
October 24. During the hearing, we discussed how cleanups are triggered and how
that process works. I have attached a record of police calls to that intersection as
well. There were 8 calls from the beginning of 2022 until now, which might have been
connected to this. It is a site that has been known to have homeless encampments.
The HART team opened a file on it in 2019. The owner has indicated that he has had
problems with this location since he came in back in 1989. The matter right now is
whether the entire assessment should be paid by the property owner or should it be
divided between the City and the owner, which is what I believe the owner is asking
for. In other cases like this, we have attached the cost to the property owner when it
is on private property, so my recommendation to you fits this standard.
Council President Brendmoen: This is interesting and different because the HART
team called it in, which is different than other circumstances, but also because they
left the stuff.
Councilmember Prince: I appreciate where you're coming from, Moermond. I don't
think we should change things in this case if we have passed these costs along in the
past, but I do think this policy may need to be revisited. The things being cleaned up
can be personal property or hazardous materials.
Robert Rulon-Miller: It's a difficult piece of property becaue it's wooded and on a
slope, but there is this flat level spot where a garage used to be. I was asking for a
shared expense because I called the police a few times, maybe not 8, but often in the
middle of the night. I don't think anything ever happened. The people stayed there
6-8 weeks and the encampment got bigger to include 4 or 5 people. If the police got
rid of them the first time around the work would have been less. I do know that also
bear responsibility and that is why I think the cost should be shared. Also, homeless
people are back. I called the police again. I was referred to someone else and they
said they would take care of it.
Brendmoen: Do you have ideas on making it less of a campground?
Rulon-Miller: One idea is to fence it off, but it's a big property, well not that big, but it
would be a big expense.
Brendmoen: Could it be developed?
Rulon-Miller: I bought this from John Rupp, and part of me buying it was an
agreement not to develop the land so that people at the University Club could look
out over woods instead of buildings. I am happy having it natural. No I cannot
develop it.
Brendmoen: So part of the challenge is that you're opting to keep it a campground.
Rulon-Miller: I'm not. I'm opting to keep it natural. An issue with a fence is that it
would have to go all the way up to Summit Ave, and even then someone could go
through my yard to get there. I'm not trying to create a home for the homeless people.