couldn’t transfer the title until you have the family go through probate. There are 4 or 5
children. The title is definitely clouded. They would arguably need to be notified and
sign off on their ownership interest. Since there’s no filing I assume that isn’t
happening, but perhaps you have other information.
Greenfield: I don’t know what your gap is up there, I can send you a copy of the
missing assignment of mortgage, as well as the filings of complaint, which would show
you the steps my client is taking to acquire the property. It is a title problem, not just a
code issue. It is an issue when my client inherited the problem versus causing them
as well as staring down the barrel of significant loss. We’ve had success in numerous
jurisdictions where the governing body joins with us in what is essentially a 3-party
stipulation where the sell would pay an agreed upon sum for any fines. The buyer is
permitted to assume the liability and the municipality will give their assent to the
conveyance. I’m happy to send you a draft of what that would look like.
Moermond: no, we won’t do that. The owners are responsible for abating the nuisance
condition. The City is the enforcement agent. I am not interested in pursuing that,
perhaps the City Council has the palate for doing that. I’m not the decision-maker, I
just make recommendations. I am concerned about the ability of Select Portfolio to do
anything in a timely fashion when we started this February 14. Rolling it back means
the Order to Abate was issued November 28, 2022 to your client. It has been a lot of
lead time to do things required. According to our systems we haven’t got traction on
anything. I’m willing to continue this for two weeks and see where you are at. We can
talk May 9 and send it to Council May 17 with a recommendation on where we go from
here. At this juncture I’m not seeing my way clear. We are also actively looking for US
Bank to be a party in this conversation. Ultimately it is them who hired Select Portfolio
and was disappointed in the lack of participation of your client until we tracked you
down and encouraged you to participate. Thank you for doing that, but again this is
something we’ve been trying to do for a long time without much success. Let’s get
some movement going, hopefully, and hope there can be resolution sooner than later.
Greenfield: I appreciate your time today and permitting me to have a second bite at the
apple, as it were. I’ll address some of your concerns then.
Moermond: fantastic, we’ll send a follow up letter confirming the details so you have
that.
Laid Over to the Legislative Hearings due back on 5/9/2023
2
RLH RR 23-8
Ordering the rehabilitation or razing and removal of the structures at 1082
LOEB STREET within fifteen (15) days after the March 22, 2023, City
Council Public Hearing. (To refer back to March 28, 2023 Legislative
Hearing)
Brendmoen
Sponsors:
Layover to LH May 23, 2023 at 9 am for further discussion. (CPH May 24)
Heidi Hovis, attorney o/b/o MN Department of Housing, appeared
Hovis: they pulled out of the sale, its back on the MLS. The realtor has indicated
significant interest, but no offers as of last night when I checked. Our goal is finding a
new buyer, maybe one more invested in the process, who can be more concrete in the
timeline and plan for the property. We are kind of back to square one. We do believe
we will get another purchaser; we would like some time especially with it being spring.
Moermond: in the purchase agreement you were selling for $40,000, it is listed again
for $50,000. That’s our team to put together. When I briefed the Council President