Adopted as amended (remove only)
6 -
0
Yea:
Councilmember Noecker, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember Yang,
Councilmember Kim, Councilmember Jost and Councilmember Johnson
Nay:
1 - Councilmember Bowie
Absent:
Appeal of Sharon Lee Anderson to a Vacant Building Registration
Requirement at 697 SURREY AVENUE.
44
Appeal denied.
Sharon Anderson, owner and appellant, appeared by phone
Lauren Lightner Ross, social worker for appellant, appeared by phone
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This was referred to the Vacant Building
Program after a condemnation and order to vacate. The condemnation order was not
appealed. The condemnation was established and the Vacant Building Registration
comes from information obtained there. I found that photos corroborated the
statements in the condemnation report. It indicates gross unsanitary conditions,
hoarded conditions creating a fire hazard, lack of maintenance, overwhelming smell of
cat urine, very small walking paths, questionable plumbing and water hookups, and the
area around the structure being in bad condition. You can see photos on the screen in
front of you, including an aerial view showing the roof, which was called out for being in
bad repair. The photos were taken by a police officer who was doing several welfare
checks and shared the photos with the Department of Safety of Inspections (DSI). DSI
staff did not enter. The appellant says they shouldn’t be in the Vacant Building
Program because there are possessions inside and the property is owned outright. The
issue is this property still falls within the definition of a vacant building, according to
City code. Conditions call for it being a Category 2 Vacant Building, and it will need an
inspection report and rehabilitation to be lived in again.
Council President Jalali: Your recommendation is to not grant the appeal?
Moermond: My recommendation is to deny the appeal.
Lauren Lightner Ross: Sharon is asking that I as her social worker state what she's
asking for. She feels that it should go to district court because the warrant was signed
by a district court judge that removed her from her home.
Sharon Anderson: I am the owner and also a candidate for the State House of
Representatives in District 67b. Councilmember Johnson needs to investigate the
warrant that was signed by the district court judge, which states that there is probable
cause that a crime was committed.
Jalali: You need to stick to the topic of the public hearing which is the matter of the
Vacant Building Registration.
Anderson: The warrant was null and nullified the condemnation, which was never
properly served. I'm in the hospital. You better get your ducks in a row. The warrant
must go to the judge. No matter how you rule, we are appealing that to the judge.
Moermond has been served in a PDF format. The warrant, our objections, and she is
recklessly disregarding her subject matter jurisdiction. The constitutionality of a
warrant that would negate any condemnation or Vacant Building Registration.
Therefore, I'm the owner, I've been in the hospital for 30 days. I think Councilmember
Noecker better visit me at the Highland Chateau to get this resolved. The 5th