5 -
0
Yea:
Councilmember Yang, Councilmember Kim, Councilmember Jost,
Councilmember Johnson and Councilmember Privratsky
Nay:
2 - Councilmember Noecker and Councilmember Bowie
Absent:
Amending Council File RLH AR 24-25 to reduce the assessment Collection of
Vacant Building Registration fees billed during April 5 to October 20, 2023 at
1350 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. VB2407, Assessment No. 248806) (Public
hearing closed and laid over from August 27, 2025)
46
Public hearing continued for 3 weeks.
Ashley and Bradley Taylor, property owners, appeared in person
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer: This is an unusual circumstance
amending a previously ratified vacant building assessment that has been certified to
property taxes for 2025. Any reduction adopted by Council would come in the form of a
refund. We needed to investigate a possible error in Legislative Hearing. This was a
registered vacant building since 2019. There used to be two buildings on the parcel.
One was knocked down. The other continued to exist without a use as a vacant
building. It needed to be fixed and get its Fire Certificate of Occupancy (FCO) back,
and the changes the owner wanted also required a change in use. In 2022, there was
work on the property done without permits. The Department of Safety and Inspections
(DSI) spoke to the owner about that. In February 2024, the Change in Use documents
were submitted to DSI. The vacant building file was closed in March. In the normal
course of events, I would ask Council to consider prorating the assessment. The bill
was from October 2023 through October 2024 and the building was out in March at 6
months in. Was a mistake made? My finding is no. To treat it as similar cases to
those that are timely, you could prorate this amount as a refund, which is my
recommendation.
Ashley Taylor: We did not own the building until halfway through 2023. We got letters
about this, and each time we got one we called, texted, or showed up in-person to DSI.
We were told repeatedly that the letter was a mistake by Clint Zane, Nathan Brune,
and Matt Dornfeld. We did everything we could and were told to ignore the letter. There
may have been confusion. Maybe the inspectors weren't out there in-person and
weren't aware. We were told this was a mistake within the system and that it would be
pulled off 6 or 7 times. We trusted the inspectors and then saw this $5,000 bill on our
taxes two years later in 2025. We would not have just ignored this bill. We developed
this property as a community garden under the Hamline Ave bridge.
Councilmember Kim: What is your ask?
A. Taylor: We want the entire bill removed, since that was what we were told would
happen in 2023.
Kim: Because Councilmember Bowie is out, I will move to continue the public hearing
for three weeks.
Public hearing continued to August 27, 2025
5 -
0
Yea:
Councilmember Yang, Councilmember Kim, Councilmember Jost,
Councilmember Johnson and Councilmember Privratsky
Nay:
2 - Councilmember Noecker and Councilmember Bowie
Absent: