City Hall and Court House  
15 West Kellogg Boulevard  
Council Chambers - 3rd  
Floor  
City of Saint Paul  
651-266-8560  
Meeting Minutes - Action Only  
City Council  
Council President Amy Brendmoen  
Councilmember Russel Balenger  
Councilmember Mitra Jalali  
Councilmember Rebecca Noecker  
Councilmember Jane L. Prince  
Councilmember Chris Tolbert  
Councilmember Nelsie Yang  
Wednesday, June 21, 2023  
ROLL CALL  
3:30 PM  
Council Chambers - 3rd Floor  
Meeting started at 3:32 PM  
7 - Councilmember Amy Brendmoen, Councilmember Chris Tolbert,  
Councilmember Rebecca Noecker, Councilmember Jane L. Prince,  
Councilmember Mitra Jalali, Councilmember Nelsie Yang and  
Councilmember Russel Balenger  
Present  
COMMUNICATIONS & RECEIVE/FILE  
Letter from the Department of Safety and Inspections declaring 50 Fillmore  
Avenue East a nuisance property. (For notification purposes only; public  
hearings will be scheduled at a later date if necessary.)  
1
2
3
Received and Filed  
Establishing five (5) new projects through the Neighborhood STAR  
Year-Round Program as adopted via City Council Resolutions # 23-795 and  
23-770.  
Received and Filed  
Amending the 2022 and 2023 Capital Improvement Budgets to allocate  
funding for Community Proposal Set Aside Allocations to appropriate  
departments, as recommended by the Capital Improvement Budget  
Committee.  
Received and Filed  
Amending ESG project budgets: funding for 2021-22 Emergency Solutions  
Grant activities administered by Ramsey County per the Joint Powers  
Agreement approved via RES 19-2110.  
4
5
Received and Filed  
Amending ESG project budgets: funding for 2022-23 Emergency Solutions  
Grant activities administered by Ramsey County per the Joint Powers  
Agreement approved via RES 19-2110.  
Received and Filed  
Authorizing the Police Department to reallocate its 2023 Special Fund budget  
to reflect expenditures more accurately.  
6
Received and Filed  
CONSENT AGENDA  
Items listed under the Consent Agenda will be enacted by one motion with no separate  
discussion. If discussion on an item is desired, the item will be removed from the  
Consent Agenda for separate consideration.  
Approval of the Consent Agenda  
Council President Brendmoen stated that Item 20 would be taken separately.  
Councilmember Balenger moved approval.  
Consent Agenda adopted as amended  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
0
Approving the City’s cost of providing Property Clean Up services during April  
19 to 28, 2023, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for July 18, 2023 and  
City Council public hearing for August 23, 2023 to consider and levy the  
assessments against individual properties. (File No. J2324A, Assessment  
No. 238531)  
7
8
Adopted  
Approving the City’s cost of providing Property Clean Up services during May  
1 to 11, 2023, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for July 18, 2023 and  
City Council public hearing for August 23, 2023 to consider and levy the  
assessments against individual properties. (File No. J2325A, Assessment  
No. 238533)  
Adopted  
Authorizing the City to renew a lease agreement with Ramsey County for the  
Ramsey County Sheriff Office's use of space in the City Hall Annex.  
9
Adopted  
Approving the Collective Bargaining Agreement (January 1, 2023 -  
December 31, 2025) and Memorandums of Agreement between the City and  
the Professional Employees Association, Inc.  
10  
Laid over to June 28, 2023  
Authorizing the Fire Department to pay for all costs incurred to host a  
graduation ceremony for new firefighters on July 14, 2023 at the Paul and  
Sheila Wellstone Center.  
11  
Adopted  
Authorizing the City to enter into a joint powers agreement with the  
Minnesota State Agricultural Society to provide augmented police services in  
and around its fairgrounds location.  
12  
Adopted  
Preliminary Order setting the date of Public Hearing for July 26, 2023 to  
consider approval of the 2023 Mill and Overlay Program.  
13  
14  
Adopted  
Approving the settlement agreement and release between the City and Sara  
Romdenne and her attorneys, Gus Nicklow and the firm of Meshbesher &  
Spence.  
Adopted  
Accepting the gift of travel expenses from the Aspen Institute for Mayor  
Melvin Carter to attend the Aspen Ideas Festival in Aspen, Colorado, from  
June 26-28, 2023.  
15  
Adopted  
Adopting the 2022 Stormwater Permit Annual Report.  
16  
17  
Adopted  
Authorizing the City to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the State to  
commission a painted public art installation on the State-owned State Trail  
Bridge facing the City administered Grand Round Regional Trail.  
Adopted  
Approving the use of grant funds through the Ward 7 Neighborhood STAR  
Year-Round Program for Dayton's Bluff Community Council in partnership  
with St. Paul Parks Department, Wakan Tipi Awanyankapi, and Swede  
Hollow Cafe.  
18  
Adopted  
Approving precinct boundary and polling location changes for Wards 1 and 2  
for the November 7, 2023 General Election.  
19  
21  
22  
23  
Adopted  
Approving the Mayor’s appointment of Margot Trout and Hannah Hoeger to  
the Saint Paul Climate Justice Advisory Board.  
Adopted  
Approving the Mayor’s reappointment of Kevin Gallatin to a two-year term on  
the MSP International Airport Noise Oversight Committee.  
Adopted  
Approving the Mayor’s appointment of Kenn Rockler to the Mayor’s Advisory  
Committee on People with Disabilities.  
Adopted  
Approving the Collective Bargaining Agreement (January 1, 2023 -  
December 31, 2025) and Memorandums of Agreement between the City of  
Saint Paul and AFSCME Local 3757 - Legal.  
24  
20  
Adopted  
FOR DISCUSSION  
Approving Laws 2023, Chapter 64, Article 10, Sections 2, Section 3, Section  
4, and Section 5 authorizing the City to impose a local sales and use tax in  
the amount of one percent for the purpose of financing certain improvements  
to streets, bridges, and parks and recreation facilities.  
Councilmember Prince asked for details on how funds could be used.  
Andy Rodriguez, Director of Parks and Recreation, addressed Prince's question.  
Prince spoke in opposition.  
Councilmember Tolbert spoke in support and moved approval.  
Adopted  
6 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember Yang and  
Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
1 - Councilmember Prince  
ORDINANCES  
An ordinance is a city law enacted by the City Council. It is read at three separate  
council meetings and becomes effective after passage by the Council and 30 days after  
publication in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press. Public hearings on ordinances are  
generally held at the second reading.  
First Reading  
Amending Chapter 142 of the Legislative Code (Title XII) pertaining to a  
special service district in downtown. (Public hearing continued from July 19,  
2023 for Final Adoption)  
25  
Bruce Engelbrekt, Office of Finanical Services, gave a staff report.  
Joe Spencer, Saint Paul Downtown Alliance, continued the staff report.  
Councilmember Noecker spoke in support.  
Councilmember Tolbert spoke in support.  
Councilmember Prince spoke in support.  
Council President Brendmoen moved to lay over to July 12.  
Laid over to July 12, 2023 for Second Reading  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
0
Amending Legislative Code Chapter 63 pertaining to off-street parking facility  
standards and design.  
26  
Council President Brendmoen stated that the staff report would take place during the  
public hearing.  
Councilmember Tolbert moved to lay over for one week.  
Laid over to June 28, 2023 for Second Reading  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
0
Amending the Ford Site (Highland Bridge) Zoning and Public Realm Master  
Plan to accommodate a proposed project by the University of Saint Thomas.  
27  
Councilmember Tolbert moved Version 3 and to lay over for one week.  
Amended and laid over to June 28, 2023 for Second Reading  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
0
Nay:  
PUBLIC HEARINGS  
Live testimony is limited to two minutes for each person. See below for optional ways  
to testify.  
Approving the application of Colleen Healy for a sound level variance in order  
to present amplified sound on July 4, 2023 at 30 Langford Park - Langford  
Park Bandstand.  
28  
Councilmember Jalali moved approval.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
0
Nay:  
Approving the applications of the Minnesota United FC for sound level  
variance applications in order to present amplified sound on July 1, 8 and 15,  
2023, within the Street and the Beer Garden Area at Allianz Field - 400  
Snelling Avenue North.  
29  
Councilmember Balenger moved approval.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
0
Approving the application of DanceCo for a sound level variance in order to  
present amplified sound on July 8, 2023 at 2 Wabasha Street South -  
Raspberry Island.  
30  
31  
32  
33  
Councilmember Noecker moved approval.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
0
Nay:  
Approving the application of Nikki Hubin for a sound level variance in order to  
present amplified sound on June 24, 2023 at 1 Leech Street - Hope  
Breakfast Bar.  
Councilmember Noecker moved approval.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
0
Nay:  
Approving the application of Jamesetta Polahn and Samuel Rusch for a  
sound level variance in order to present amplified sound on June 23, 2023 at  
Rice Park - 109 Fourth Street West.  
Councilmember Noecker moved approval.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
0
Nay:  
Preliminary plat approval for The Heights.  
Bill Dermody, City Planner, gave a staff report.  
Councilmember Yang spoke in support.  
Joan & Dan Huneke spoke during the public hearing.  
Tom Stephanic spoke during the public hearing.  
Yang moved approval.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
0
LEGISLATIVE HEARING DISCUSSION ITEM  
Appeal of Gaius Poehler to a Rent Stabilization Determination at 476  
41  
HERSCHEL STREET, Apt. 10  
Appeal denied.  
Also in attendance: Gaius Poehler, appellant  
Marcia Moermond: Legislative Hearing Officer: This appeal is of a determination  
made by the Department of Safety and Inspections (DSI) that this building does  
qualify for a rent increase of 3% to 8%, which was asked for through the self  
certification process online. That's more-or-less an automated process that involves  
minimal staff review. That application was received on March 21st, and I would note  
that last week I talked about a problem having the wrong form on the website, that  
they were using the previous year's form. This application was made in March, and  
still the wrong form was on the website. The numbers we're talking about today are  
once again 2019 numbers compared to 2021 numbers. We do not have the 2022  
numbers in front of us. I'm using the old numbers that were asked for and used in the  
application. In a separate analysis when staff looked into the review, their finding was  
that this building would actually qualify for a 13.1% increase. This is what they would  
be allowed using the old numbers. The unit that you are looking at today has an  
increase above the 3% rent cap rent. That proposal is 3.2% for this particular unit.  
The rent change is from $899 to $928. That comes up to 3.2%. That is for a 12 month  
lease. Were the tenant to pursue a month to month lease, there would be an  
administrative charge attached that would be taking the entire total of all the fees and  
the rent to approximately a 6% increase. This is still below the 8% number. A  
question came up in the course of the hearing that if a month to month lease were  
pursued there could be potential for increases along the way that could exceed the  
8% of those minor increases throughout the year. The answer is: No, there could not  
be those increases. They would have been approved for 8% for the entire year, even  
if there's minor adjustments along the way in that particular lease. What I will say is  
that this is a Class A property. There are no known code violations and the primary  
drivers which we know exist for the increase in rent are property taxes and the  
Consumer Price Index. The Consumer Price index for this application was 6.5%. If it  
had been current, the application would then have been 13.95%. With the staff  
analysis saying they qualified for 13.1% with the old numbers, the new numbers  
would have shown an even higher allowed number. In the course of the hearing, the  
tenant articulated a handful of reasons that he believed that a rent increase was not  
appropriate for this particular unit. First is that he was disappointed in what he  
understood to be an agreement with management that there would be no rent  
increase from his current lease into his next. There was actually a proposed increase.  
He also mentioned that he believed that a recent settlement agreement between  
Housing Hub and the Minnesota Attorney General's office played a significant role in  
the request to increase the rent. We did discuss that thoroughly. A 3rd reason is that  
he believed there were significant code violations. Again, this is a Category A  
building. The code violation he mentioned most specifically has to do with the lack of  
heat for a 24-hour time period in which space heaters needed to be provided, and  
then the heat was corrected. According to his testimony, he also mentioned how fees  
were charged, regarding being included in rent versus charged separately. In  
ordinance, it’s the same group of things counted together, no matter if it's billed  
separately or not. The staff analysis does come out the same, even if it's bill out  
separately. There was a question about whether or not it was allowed for those to be  
charged separately. And the answer is: Yes, as long as the total amount isn’t  
changed above that 3% to 8% applied for. The role of the settlement with the  
Attorney General, I believe that it's a cost of doing business and that it is legitimately  
incorporated into the costs. In the same fashion, if I were to fill out my taxes  
incorrectly and be audited, I may be subject to penalties and interest for that. That's a  
cost. I did it wrong and it needs to be it corrected. And it is a part of the expense of  
operating. We are again looking at a significant differential between what would be  
allowed and what's being asked for if the tenant signs a 12-month lease. The 3.2%  
increase and the month to month lease which would have special fees to be closer to  
6% are both below the 8% applied for an allowed. Had they gone through staff  
determination it could have been higher.  
Council President Brendmoen: I believe you said that the property with proper  
numbers would be qualified up to 13% increase. The increase being requested is  
3.2%, 0.2% above what is allowed by right. If it was a month to month, it could go to  
about a 6% increase, because of the administrative costs that are added.  
Moermond: Changing the type of lease that’s used does add that administrative fee.  
Brendmoen: And you mentioned that fees are part of rent, so that would be included.  
Moermond: For example, if garbage is charged out separately but used to be  
included as part of rent, the staff analysis would say garbage is a housing service,  
counting it as a part of the increase in costs.  
Brendmoen: I appreciate that. It's something that we paid special attention to with the  
amendments to that ordinance and making sure that any additional fees are still  
considered cost of rent.  
Gaius Poehler: I think Moermond’s recommendation is wrong. Saint Paul and other  
city governments are no not regulating, but instead partnering with property  
companies whose selfish business interests compromise the fair and healthy  
treatment of tenants living in their buildings. Even rating organizations like the Better  
Business Bureau, which gave Herschel Apartments LLC an A rating, don't accurately  
reflect the business practices of said property companies. Throughout the May 22,  
2023, appeal hearing, Moermond was on the side of the property owner. She was  
demonstrating that she is an extension of the property company, instead of an  
independent objective regulator. For example: the property management company  
Housing Hub’s non-adherance to Herschel Apartments own written month-to-month  
lease, their not providing sufficient heat, and maintenance not being performed by  
staff. See evidence of this in the attachments. I could use this, but I would like to give  
you the attachments if I could. I know you're voting on this today, but I just want to  
leave it for the record, if that's okay. I’ll conclude by saying the City of Saint Paul's  
public contention Rent Stabilization Appeal Hearings provide forum for reviewing  
appeals of Department of Safety Inspections (DSI) determinations on applications for  
an exception to the City's 3% rent increase cap is an accurate statement. The rent  
stabilization hearings ar merely the City of Saint Paul's directive from the property  
companies that they partner with to present an image of tenant consideration, when,  
in fact, the City has been directed by said property companies and has no intention of  
granting an appeal to the 3% rent cap exception. I think some of the figures  
Moermond was mentioning are not accurate based on my information. In these  
records here, it will show that there was direct correspondence to me to assure me  
that I was not going to have my rent raised. They did raise it literally a day before I  
was to have the hearing. That concludes my testimony. I have additional documents  
here to give to somebody.  
Councilmember Jalali moved to close the public hearing. Approved 7-0.  
Councilmember Jalali: I was trying to keep notes on what you're saying and I have a  
follow-up question. You mentioned there's a number like practices and things related  
to the property’s management that you had concerns about. I heard maintenance not  
performed and was just trying to keep up with because you were speaking so fast.  
Would you mind just playing back that part? Please describe property management  
issues you're experiencing. They're not governed by the same rules as the Rent  
Stabilization Review process, but they're part of how you're experiencing housing. I'd  
like to understand that better is part of our response.  
Poehler: I've lived there for about 26 years. Throughout that time, there's been  
variances to how much attention is paid to keep the building running. When this  
company took over. because I don't want to live in a place that's falling apart, I spent  
a lot of my own time trying to make up for things that don't get done. There's still a big  
hole in somebody’s window that they never fixed. I’ve taken pictures of it. It's in the  
record. I just felt I had to come up here and talk about it because at least it's in the  
record, even if it's not going to be voted on. I think that the conditions there are not  
abysmal, but they certainly are not great. They don't have a caretaker. Because I live  
there, I don't want the place to fall apart. I do things on my own, kind of a regular  
basis every day. I'm not paid any money for that. In fact, now they’re raising my rent.  
The attachments show the details of that. It's continued on since they took over the  
company. Those are some examples. I have to kind of pull teeth to try to ask them to  
fix stuff. A cute one was where the heat wasn't there for 24 hours. I actually didn't feel  
very good that night but had to try to get through it. It was my space heater. They  
didn't provide a space heater. I had used my own. It's my bill, my money. If we're  
talking about money, I think there's something more to this than just money. It's the  
conditions, feelings, and safety for the tenants. Money is not everything. Maybe to a  
company, but it's not certainly the case for the people that are just trying feel  
comfortable in their living space. I'm generalizing, but that's the overall feeling. Now  
they want to raise more rent.  
Jalali: This is a Housing Hub property?  
Poehler: It’s called Herschel Properties, LLC. They are also the owner of their  
management company called Housing Hub, who also staffs. When you put in the  
maintenance requests on their website to come out and fix things, the two owners of  
both companies decide as to whether we're going to be charged. They determine if  
we're responsible for it as tenants or not. I'm very careful about everything I do  
because I feel like am I going to get charged. One time the drain was clogged with  
hair and that they charged us for that. I changed the kind of shampoo I use so I don't  
have a chance of that again. It’s not just about a ledger and saving money. It's about  
the feeling of the tenants. I’ve spoken to other tenants who complain about things,  
and who've since moved out. That’s something I consider doing. I like the  
neighborhood. It's convenient for me.  
Jalali: I appreciate you answering my question. This is been helpful for me. I have  
spent time studying this case to understand the picture of what rules apply to this. I  
guess I would start by saying I think that what you're bringing up is an example of  
how a landlord could go through a process and make and substantiate a case about  
how they can qualify for an exception. What's not being captured within that, though,  
is how there are costs that you're taking on simply because the quality or condition of  
the basic pieces of the unit isn’t where it should be. I want you to know that I see and  
understand that the rules that govern whether landlord can get an exception are  
about the information they present. That gets reviewed to show the reasonable return  
on investment standard that they have to qualify for. And it's my understanding they  
have qualified for more than what they could be getting, and that they're doing an  
incremental increase. The way that I have to make this determination is: has that  
information been substantiated? In this case, I see that it has. But that doesn't mean  
that this limit is fulfilling the obligation to you. I actually paid extra attention to this  
case because of Housing Hub’s poor reputation in the community long before the  
Attorney General had even successfully won like $63,000 from them for things like  
charging renters for carpet cleaning, replacing batteries, light bulb, filters. I hope you  
can see that. I want to more closely involve myself and my office in supporting you  
with some of the management issues that are going on at your site, because those  
things should not have to be borne by you. What I'll do is I will move the  
recommendation of the hearing officer, which is on tonight’s appeal. But I would like  
to make sure that you are connected with my staff from here on out so that we can  
actually hold them accountable to the other rules that regulate the things that you're  
describing. That's making sure that they're doing what they need to do under the  
Department of Safety Inspections. There are rights that you have under our city laws,  
separate from rent stabilization, like requesting an inspection. We regularly ask for  
inspections for renters who reach out to us because their landlord is unresponsive or  
taking too long, functionally denying them a part of their housing experience because  
they just don't do minor repairs. I would like for you to have some additional support  
around that, so that your situation improves. My legislative aide Doua Yang is here.  
I’m going to make sure that you all have each other's connection and I’ll follow-up to  
chat with you after this, so that we're handling all of the matters that we can. I think  
that in general, we need to be looking at and evaluating: How is this new appeals  
process working? Clearly there are going to be exceptions that are granted, but the  
tenants still have other issues they're experiencing or there's a another side to the  
story that the rules are not capturing enough to enforce the type of decisions that I  
would like to be making. I want you to know that from policy level, I'm looking into  
that. I wanted to just round out how all that fits together. What I'd like to do is, you can  
chat with Doua right away, and then once we get to the end of our agenda, if I'm still  
here and you're still here we can touch base to chat more.  
Brendmoen: I appreciate the distinction between the matter in front of us and the  
larger matter of the services provided.  
Moermond: I just wanted to, because I have to, summarize for the record, the  
additional information that's been provided. A lot of what's here is attached to the  
appeal document, which is the first attachment within the record. There is an  
attachment of the correspondence that's given the decision and the back and forth on  
scheduling and so on. There's summary information from the city's website as to how  
to apply for the exception to rent cap. There are some additional photographs of  
violations like some garbage bags in the window and so on, which was discussed. In  
the not too distant future, you'll see another Housing Hub appeal.  
Adopted  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
Nay:  
0
LEGISLATIVE HEARING CONSENT AGENDA  
Items listed under the Consent Agenda will receive a combined public hearing and be  
enacted by one motion with no separate discussion. Items may be removed from the  
Consent Agenda for a separate public hearing and discussion if desired.  
Approval of the Consent Agenda  
Councilmember Yang moved approval.  
Legislative Hearing Consent Agenda adopted as amended  
7 - Councilmember Brendmoen, Councilmember Tolbert, Councilmember  
Noecker, Councilmember Prince, Councilmember Jalali, Councilmember  
Yang and Councilmember Balenger  
Yea:  
0
Nay:  
Appeal of Hope D. Glaser to a Summary Abatement Order at 711 BEDFORD  
STREET.  
34  
35  
36  
Adopted  
Appeal of Kurt Wescott to a Vacant Building Registration Requirement at 32  
BENHILL ROAD.  
Adopted  
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 399 BLAIR  
AVENUE. (File No. J2308E, Assessment No. 238307) (To refer to August 1,  
2023 Legislative Hearing)  
Referred to August 1, 2023 Legislative Hearing  
Appeal of Shore Vang and Xue Thao to a Summary Abatement Order at  
1318 BUSH AVENUE.  
37  
38  
39  
Adopted  
Appeal of Kerry Lee to a Vehicle Abatement Order at 315 CHARLES  
AVENUE.  
Adopted  
Fourth Making finding on the appealed substantial abatement ordered for  
318 EDMUND AVENUE in Council File RLH RR 21-11. (Public hearing  
closed and laid over from April 26, 2023. Laid over again on May 22 and  
June 21, 2023)  
Amended and laid over to July 12, 2023  
Appeal of David Busch, DRB #24 LLC, to a Vacant Building Registration  
Notice at 547 EDMUND AVENUE.  
ADJOURNMENT  
40  
42  
43  
Adopted  
Appeal of Lee Yan to a Vacant Building Registration Renewal Notice at 1540  
MINNEHAHA AVENUE EAST.  
Adopted  
Appeal of Carolyn Brown and Shai Leibovich to a Vacant Building  
Registration Fee Warning Letter at 713 PREBLE STREET.  
Adopted  
Meeting ended at 4:38 PM  
City Council meetings are open for in person attendance, but the public may also  
comment on public hearing items in writing or via voicemail. Any comments and  
materials submitted by 12:00 pm of the day before the meeting will be attached to the  
public record and available for review by the City Council. Comments may be  
submitted as follows:  
The public may comment on public hearing items in writing or via voicemail. Any  
comments and materials submitted by 12:00 pm of the day before the meeting will be  
attached to the public record and available for review by the City Council. Comments  
may be submitted as follows:  
Written public comment on public hearing items can be submitted to  
Contact-Council@ci.stpaul.mn.us, CouncilHearing@ci.stpaul.mn.us, or by voicemail at  
651-266-6805. Live testimony will be taken in person in the Council Chambers, and by  
telephone by registering to speak by noon on the day before the meeting. The  
Council Meeting Information  
The City Council is paperless which saves the environment and reduces expenses. The  
agendas and Council files are all available on the Web (see below). Council members  
use mobile devices to review the files during the meeting. Using a mobile device  
greatly reduces costs since most agendas, including the documents attached to files,  
are over 1000 pages when printed.  
Web  
Meetings are available on the Council's website. Email notification and web feeds  
(RSS) of newly released minutes, agendas, and meetings are available by subscription.  
minutes, and supporting documents.  
Cable  
Meetings are live on St Paul Channel 18 and replayed at various times. Check your  
local listings.