Faust: Is there a program for a loan I could take against the house to have it repaired?
MM: The City does not have that. The two things working against you are that the
building is a Category 3 Vacant Building and that there is a demolition order hanging
over it. Those are red flags for financial institutions and can make getting financing
from them difficult. The current demo order is for 15 days, and it could be extended to
180 days to rehabilitate or remove. If you are at the 50% mark after 180 days, you
could get another extension of 180 days and your permits could be extended as well.
What I would look for at that halfway mark in making a recommendation like that to
the City Council is an updated work plan and evidence that you didn’t run out of money.
To your question though, there is a mechanism for this through a financial institution,
but I am not aware of a City program like that. I’m also not aware of any program to
help you pay past-due taxes. In fact, loans from financial institutions would likely
require that taxes are taken care of. So, you have people with you today and I would
like to understand their interest here. I also understand you have an application for a
living situation.
Faust: It’s for Central Towers, downtown. Right now, I’m in my car.
D. Marks: Dennis has applied for and been accepted into Central Towers. I spoke with
them by email yesterday and they have the last pieces of information they need. They
are just scheduling a move-in date. Our interest is primarily about getting Dennis to a
place where he can get something out of the house and use that money to live the rest
of his life. We do have an interest in buying the property but have no formal agreement
with him to do so. We have not yet committed, and it depends on coming to an
agreement with Dennis. Right now, we are just helping him out to get to that point
where he has a place to live, can sell the property, and get the money for it to live the
best he can.
Moermond: I know this may be a big pill to swallow for the property owner. My concern
is that Dennis has somewhere safe to live. That may mean taking money from the
property you own to pay for somewhere else you can live in, assuming on my part that
you don’t have funds otherwise. Since you own the property outright, it is kind of a
savings account to pay for other housing. You have an asset but are effectively
homeless, and this asset can help provide a safe place for you to live. I want you to
think hard about the pros and cons of your options. I have seen situations like this
before. You could go to a real estate office and get an estimate of the property from a
broker. You could also get an attorney. I am assuming you don’t have money for an
attorney, and I would like to get you contact info for Southern Minnesota Regional
Legal Services. They don’t usually handle your kind of case. They usually work with
threats of evictions, but I have seen on some occasions where an attorney in their
office can find a pro bono lawyer through the state bar association. I did work recently
with a property owner in a similar situation who was living on the green line. The pro
bono attorney was able to help get him a place to live in an apartment and had had
money in a savings account by selling the property. It’s a hard thing to do. Time is
money right now though.
Yannarelly: And if it gets demolished it gets worse.
Moermond: That’s correct. If nothing is done and the house gets demolished, your
asset loses value and you could walk away with nothing if the back taxes are equal to
the value of what’s left after demolition. Time is not your friend. I’m sorry to be so plain
in my language. I know this is going to be hard as you sort through this in the next few
days. I know there are realtors out there who know your neighborhood well. I can’t
make specific referrals. It sounds like Rebecca and David Marks may know someone.
D. Marks: I believe a real estate agent has been in contact with you already. One of