15 West Kellogg Blvd.  
Saint Paul, MN 55102  
City of Saint Paul  
Meeting Minutes - Action Only  
Legislative Hearings  
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer  
Mai Vang, Hearing Coordinator  
Joanna Zimny, Executive Assistant  
651-266-8585  
Tuesday, December 12, 2023  
9:00 AM  
Room 330 City Hall & Court House/Remote  
9:00 a.m. Hearings  
Remove/Repair Orders  
Ordering the razing and removal of the structures at 594 BRUNSON STREET  
within fifteen (15) days after the November 1, 2023, City Council Public  
Hearing. (To refer back to December 12, 2023 Legislative Hearing)  
RLH RR 23-61  
RLH RR 23-62  
1
2
3
4
Noecker  
Sponsors:  
Layover to December 19 at 3 pm  
Laid Over to the Legislative Hearings due back on 12/19/2023  
Ordering the rehabilitation or razing and removal of the structures at 1058  
JESSIE STREET within fifteen (15) days after the December 8, 2023, City  
Council Public Hearing.  
Brendmoen  
Sponsors:  
Layover to December 19 at 3 pm  
Laid Over to the Legislative Hearings due back on 12/19/2023  
Ordering the rehabilitation or razing and removal of the structures at 975  
REANEY AVENUE within fifteen (15) days after the January 17, 2024, City  
Council Public Hearing.  
Yang  
Sponsors:  
Remove or repair within 180 days.  
Referred to the City Council due back on 1/17/2024  
Ordering the rehabilitation or razing and removal of the structures at 188  
ACKER STREET EAST within fifteen (15) days after the January 17, 2024,  
City Council Public Hearing.  
Balenger  
Sponsors:  
Layover to January 16, 2024 Legislative Hearing. PH Jan 17.  
Referred to the City Council due back on 1/17/2024  
Ordering the rehabilitation or razing and removal of the structures at 195  
GOODRICH AVENUE within fifteen (15) days after the January 17, 2024, City  
Council Public Hearing.  
5
Noecker  
Sponsors:  
Laid over to December 28 Legislative Hearing at 9 am for progress check on  
inspection report and status of legal and real estate advisors.  
Dennis Faust, property owner, appeared in-person  
David Marks, neighbor, appeared in-person  
Rebecca Marks, neighbor, appeared in-person  
[Moermond gives background on the appeals process]  
Faust: I would like to keep the house. I’ve had OCD since I was a child. I’ve had  
hoarding problems for a while, and these 2 (referring to David and Rebecca Marks)  
have helped me and expressed interest in buying it.  
Moermond: According to City Code, all properties that are going to be rehabilitated first  
need a Code Compliance Inspection Report and a $5,000 Performance Deposit. For  
the inspection, four trades inspectors will go through the property and create a list of  
what needs to be brought up to code. This does not always mean it needs to be  
brought up to 2024 code for something like electrical. If the wall is open, then yes. If  
the wall is not opened already, only in exceptional circumstances like a flood would you  
be required to do so. The goal of the list is to bring the property back into compliance  
and make it habitable again. All permits associated with it need to be closed. That is  
the finish line to getting out of the vacant building program.  
To ask the Council for a grant of time, I also need a work plan to show that whoever is  
going to do the work has bids to do the work, and indicates that contractors have a  
schedule. We then need to see evidence of financing to do the work. Once we have  
that, I can ask Council for a grant of time. We don’t have an inspection report because  
it was a hoarded property. Inspectors can’t see the walls and the floors well. The  
property needs to be cleared before an inspector can get through. I also look at  
whether there is a clear title, or is it possibly clouded. I look at whether taxes are owed  
also. These are things that are potential impediments to a clear pathway towards  
success. If you are working with a third party to do the work, I would need to see a  
contract between you all that shows how that's going to look, and how you are paying  
them. This could be by virtue of a mortgage on the property or a purchase agreement  
with a rider saying that it will not transfer until it's out of the vacant building program.  
Those are some examples and are happy to provide others.  
Staff report by Supervisor Joe Yannarelly: The building is a one and one-half story,  
wood frame, single-family dwelling on a lot of 8,843 square feet. The property was  
condemned by Code Enforcement on October 6, 2021 due to excessive storage,  
unsanitary conditions with a vacate date of October 13, 2021. The property owner was  
given an extension and upon re-inspection, was found to be noncompliant. The  
property was referred to Vacant Buildings with files opened on October 25, 2021. The  
current property owner is Dennis J Faust, per AMANDA and Ramsey County Property  
records.  
On September 13, 2023, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of  
deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed and photographs  
were taken. An Order to Abate a Nuisance Building was posted on September 20,  
2023, with a compliance date of October 20, 2023. As of this date, the property  
remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code.  
Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $44,000 on the land and $124,900  
on the building. Real estate taxes for 2023 have not been paid. The current amount  
due is $6,277.11, which includes penalty and interest.  
The vacant building registration fees were paid by assessment on December 3, 2023.  
As of December 11, 2023, a Code Compliance Inspection has not been done. As of  
December 11, 2023, the $5,000 performance deposit has not been posted. There have  
been seventeen Summary Abatement Notices since 2021. There have been nine work  
orders issued for: Garbage/rubbish, Boarding/securing, and Snow/ice. Code  
Enforcement Officers estimate the cost to repair this structure exceeds $100,000.  
The estimated cost to demolish exceeds $35,000.  
Moermond: I think I dealt with this condemnation back in 2021.  
Faust: I can’t hear you, and I only heard about a third of what Yannarelly said.  
Moermond: We will print copies of Yannarelly’s summary for you, and I will talk louder.  
Can you hear me now?  
Faust: Yes.  
Moermond: I've had a lot of practice doing exactly this. You're not the first person who's  
had difficulty hearing. The highlights that I'm taking away from that report are: We have  
a condemnation back in 2021, we've had a fair number of clean up orders from the  
photographs that I've seen, and we have a really bad hoarded condition. I'm happy that  
you've had help and gotten it cleaned out. From the record, it looks like you were going  
back there and living as best you could initially in 2021 and a bit into 2022.  
Faust: The reason for that was that when the house was boarded up, they put one  
board on the front door. The rest of the house had no boarding and a few of the  
windows had screws put in. People stole thousands and thousands of dollars of stuff,  
including sets of sterling silver and sterling candelabras. I had two beautiful civil war  
rifles also.  
Moermond: What I want to be clear about is that the house shall not be lived in until  
that certificate is issued. I’m sorry about the break-ins. Securing the property isn’t the  
city responsibility unless city staff like Police or Fire are there and find it to be open.  
Wherever the opening they saw is, they get it closed. They won’t do property  
maintenance to make sure all openings are secure. You will have to keep the property  
maintained. We’re looking at past-due taxes for the year, and I would like to see that  
caught up. I understand the Code Compliance Inspection was applied for and the  
house has been cleaned out. Did the application come with lock box combinations?  
D. Marks: Yes.  
Moermond: Good, that can often slow things down when inspectors don’t have that. I  
will now turn it over to you all to talk about your intentions for the property.  
Faust: Is there a program for a loan I could take against the house to have it repaired?  
MM: The City does not have that. The two things working against you are that the  
building is a Category 3 Vacant Building and that there is a demolition order hanging  
over it. Those are red flags for financial institutions and can make getting financing  
from them difficult. The current demo order is for 15 days, and it could be extended to  
180 days to rehabilitate or remove. If you are at the 50% mark after 180 days, you  
could get another extension of 180 days and your permits could be extended as well.  
What I would look for at that halfway mark in making a recommendation like that to  
the City Council is an updated work plan and evidence that you didn’t run out of money.  
To your question though, there is a mechanism for this through a financial institution,  
but I am not aware of a City program like that. I’m also not aware of any program to  
help you pay past-due taxes. In fact, loans from financial institutions would likely  
require that taxes are taken care of. So, you have people with you today and I would  
like to understand their interest here. I also understand you have an application for a  
living situation.  
Faust: It’s for Central Towers, downtown. Right now, I’m in my car.  
D. Marks: Dennis has applied for and been accepted into Central Towers. I spoke with  
them by email yesterday and they have the last pieces of information they need. They  
are just scheduling a move-in date. Our interest is primarily about getting Dennis to a  
place where he can get something out of the house and use that money to live the rest  
of his life. We do have an interest in buying the property but have no formal agreement  
with him to do so. We have not yet committed, and it depends on coming to an  
agreement with Dennis. Right now, we are just helping him out to get to that point  
where he has a place to live, can sell the property, and get the money for it to live the  
best he can.  
Moermond: I know this may be a big pill to swallow for the property owner. My concern  
is that Dennis has somewhere safe to live. That may mean taking money from the  
property you own to pay for somewhere else you can live in, assuming on my part that  
you don’t have funds otherwise. Since you own the property outright, it is kind of a  
savings account to pay for other housing. You have an asset but are effectively  
homeless, and this asset can help provide a safe place for you to live. I want you to  
think hard about the pros and cons of your options. I have seen situations like this  
before. You could go to a real estate office and get an estimate of the property from a  
broker. You could also get an attorney. I am assuming you don’t have money for an  
attorney, and I would like to get you contact info for Southern Minnesota Regional  
Legal Services. They don’t usually handle your kind of case. They usually work with  
threats of evictions, but I have seen on some occasions where an attorney in their  
office can find a pro bono lawyer through the state bar association. I did work recently  
with a property owner in a similar situation who was living on the green line. The pro  
bono attorney was able to help get him a place to live in an apartment and had had  
money in a savings account by selling the property. It’s a hard thing to do. Time is  
money right now though.  
Yannarelly: And if it gets demolished it gets worse.  
Moermond: That’s correct. If nothing is done and the house gets demolished, your  
asset loses value and you could walk away with nothing if the back taxes are equal to  
the value of what’s left after demolition. Time is not your friend. I’m sorry to be so plain  
in my language. I know this is going to be hard as you sort through this in the next few  
days. I know there are realtors out there who know your neighborhood well. I can’t  
make specific referrals. It sounds like Rebecca and David Marks may know someone.  
D. Marks: I believe a real estate agent has been in contact with you already. One of  
those people that goes around.  
Moermond: There may be neighborhood folks who take greater care and concern with  
understanding the property and your situation than someone like “We Buy Ugly  
Homes.” They could be more in your corner.  
Faust: The only person I can think of is a neighbor who I have not gotten along with  
over 25 years.  
Moermond: Regardless of whoever is making offers, you can step back and work  
through someone who represents you, who will understand the process and be at the  
table with you.  
Faust: If I do not wish to have that person, is it not possible to go to another?  
Moermond: If you wish. You don’t need to go through anyone, but I strongly advise that  
you get your own broker and your own financial and legal advice. The time to find those  
people is now.  
D. Marks: We’ve had these conversations. There is a person in the neighborhood who  
is a realtor, that we were going to enlist. Dennis wasn't comfortable with her doing that.  
So, I have reached out towards somebody from Edina Realty to do exactly what you've  
said: come in and give us an appraisal of what the property is worth, as a starting  
point. Regardless of if he's selling it to me or anybody else, he then knows what the  
property is worth. That's what we talked about earlier this week, Dennis, correct?  
Faust: Is that the same as me getting someone?  
Moermond: You can go through the person from Edina Realty that he mentioned. You  
can go through the Fort Road Federation. They are local and can help you find people.  
You need to think about this and we need to talk in a couple weeks. I would like if you  
could reach out and we see if we can get you an attorney and some better real estate  
advice. The inspection has already been applied for. We'll see if we can get that  
inspection report and then we'll be operating with better information. I’m going to keep  
pushing on this. I’m not going to ask the Council to vote on this in January because I  
know that if you get the inspection report in two weeks, that doesn’t give contractors a  
realistic amount of time over the holidays to provide decent estimates. My job is to  
make sure this is taken care, to make the building productive. If it’s you in the  
building, that’s great. In my experience, that is very difficult given your circumstance.  
I'm going to get you the information for legal assistance. I will put in a phone call to  
them so that they know that your circumstance is unique. They're going to want to sit  
down and talk this through with you. They will then be able to give you advice. That’s  
part one. Part two is the real estate piece. Tour best bet is probably people with  
neighborhood context. That may be a neighborhood realtor who knows somebody two  
cities away that wants to move into town. What matters it that we keep this moving.  
That we get you into housing with money and you can take care of yourself  
comfortably. You are coughing and not feeling well, and I’m very concerned about your  
living situation. Have you worked with St. Paul’s Homeless Assistance Response  
Team?  
Faust: Yes  
D. Marks: Her name is Andrea.  
Moermond: Is she the one helping with Central Towers?  
D. Marks: We expect that if not within days, then within a week or so Dennis should be  
into Central Towers.  
Moermond: Do you have somewhere warm tonight?  
Faust: Yes.  
Moermond: For real?  
Faust: For real.  
Moermond: If you said no or inkled no, I would pull on this to make sure you do, but  
you say you do. I have business cards on the table. You are all invited to take one.  
We will follow up with a letter to you. Do you have a mailing address besides the  
property, like a PO Box? How do you get mail?  
Faust: I won’t get mail. They told me mail can’t be delivered to a vacant house.  
Moermond: Here’s what we will do. Yannarelly will get a paper copy of the letter and  
tape it to the door so you can see the follow-up letter.  
D. Marks: All his mail is sent to the post office for general delivery.  
Moermond: We have you covered on this. It will be delivered. It will be there on the  
door Friday or Monday. This will be a follow-up on today’s conversation, what we talked  
about, and what next steps are. Yannarelly, are you here December 28, 2023?  
Yannarelly: I will be in that morning.  
Moermond: We will also email the letter to you to confirm the next hearing, summarize  
what we talked about today.  
D. Marks: December 28 is the next hearing?  
Moermond: I think that is best. We will check in on progress on the inspection report  
and have you talked to people. We can talk about if you need a push.  
Laid Over to the Legislative Hearings due back on 12/28/2023  
1:30 p.m. Hearings  
Orders To Vacate - Fire Certificate of Occupancy  
Appeal of Nickolas Gerr to a Revocation of Fire Certificate of Occupancy and  
Order to Vacate at 36 FRONT AVENUE.  
6
RLH VO 23-36  
Balenger  
Sponsors:  
Deny the appeal and grant an extension to June 6, 2024 for the December 11, 2023  
orders.  
Referred to the City Council due back on 1/17/2024  
Appeal of Ted Wagor, Attorney from Felhaber Larson, on behalf of 1596  
Hewitt Avenue LLC, to a Revocation of Fire Certificate of Occupancy and  
Order to Vacate at 1596 HEWITT AVENUE.  
7
Jalali  
Sponsors:  
Layover to Jan. 16, 2024 at 1:30 p.m.  
Laid Over to the Legislative Hearings due back on 1/16/2024