Referred to the City Council due back on 3/13/2024  
					Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1332  
					SARGENT AVENUE. (File No. CG2303A2, Assessment No. 230113)  
					4
					RLH TA 24-62  
					Jost  
					Sponsors:  
					Reduce from $551.89 to $116.40.  
					Moermond: This is for a reduction recommended by staff?  
					Staff report by Garbage Specialist Lydia Campbell: The property owner here states  
					that in 2022 their garbage collection was stopped by the hauler. The property owner  
					had not requested this, nor was he contacted by Waste Management about it. When  
					he finally straightened it out, the property owner received a bill for six total quarters of  
					service. The property owner states that the automatic complaint service at Waste  
					Management said he had no active account. He agrees that he might owe something  
					but doesn't think he should pay for a full 1.5 years. Because back billing for garbage  
					service is not allowed per our coordinated collection contract, staff recommend  
					reducing the Quarter 2 bill to only include service from January 1-June 30. The property  
					had a 96 gallon cart for two quarters. After our conversation yesterday, I believe we are  
					now reducing that to just include the one quarter. The reduction is to $116.40  
					Moermond: Originally it was a reduction to $338.37, but then after a conversation  
					about how the contract would impact previous quarter billing, we went with the lower  
					figure of $116.40. That wouldn't include late fees. That probably shouldn't include late  
					fees, even though it wasn't paid on time because there was an ongoing discussion  
					between the hauler and the customer about what the right bill should have been. I  
					recommend a reduction to $116.40.  
					Referred to the City Council due back on 3/13/2024  
					Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 900  
					5
					RLH TA 24-60  
					WESTMINSTER STREET. (File No. CG2304A2, Assessment No. 230115)  
					Kim  
					Sponsors:  
					Delete the assessment.  
					Staff report by Garbage Specialist Lydia Campbell: The owner purchased the property  
					on April 26, 2023. The Quarter 3 invoice from Waste Management showed that she  
					was billed for prorated Quarter 2 service starting on May 14th, 2023, pick up of two  
					large appliances, and Quarter 3 service. The property owner states that she had  
					already paid that bill so she should not owe the assessment. She showed proof of  
					payment to Waste Management on July 25, 2023 for $187.52. However, her quarter  
					three invoice was for $217.82. The charge sent to the City for assessment by Waste  
					Management was for $133.87. The owner then paid $4.78 of that assessment to the  
					City. Waste Management is unable to account for the difference in the assessment  
					they sent versus the amount paid by the property owner. After deliberating over the  
					issue with the City for about a week, Waste Management declined to answer any more  
					questions about the matter and asked that the case be closed. For this reason, we are  
					recommending a full removal of the assessment.  
					Moermond: What that translates to is that if you're not talking to us, we are in no  
					position to assess on your behalf to collect this bill. When this gets deleted, that  
					would be a part of the money that Waste Management would have been expecting the  
					City to include in its check to them. It won't get this amount in that check, correct?