arrived, the doors had been secured with screws, not boarded. The windows on the first
floor had previously been boarded by the owner, as the building was vacant. As the
photos show, these are not the grey-painted boards with the date on them that the City
uses. I contacted Fire Inspector AJ Neis and asked how he talks about these things
with property owners. I'm not sure if there was a conversation about securing openings
on the second floor, but the securing of the doors had already happened and that's
what this assessment is for.
Yang: So the work was done before the owner got there and that's what is being
assessed?
Moermond: Yes.
Noecker: Normally we have photo evidence of the work done. This seems like a
strange discrepancy where the City and the owner are both saying they did the
boarding. It would be helpful to have evidence to say the City did the securing.
Moermond: The assessment rolls says "Boarding and Securing." When we say
boarding, sometimes putting a board up is what's done. Sometimes putting screws in a
door is what's done. The doors were all that was secured, with screws. No boards were
involved or assessed for. I'm not sure what the conversation was between Neis and the
owner. It may have been about securing the structure going forward. The doors had
already been secured at that time. In Legislative Hearing, we talked about securing the
second level. The fire was started with gasoline in the staircase between the first and
second level. Both levels were damaged. The securing was done on an emergency
basis, which is required. The scene cannot be left open after a fire, especially in cases
of arson. When this is done, DSI deploys its contract manager to verify that the work
was done before a letter is sent to the owner saying what was done and connecting it
to an invoice. I would have notes from an inspection that would have occurred the
same day or the following day, but I don't have photos of the screws. I cannot provide
you that until City systems are operational again.
Noecker: So the charge is for screwing the doors shut, no boarding?
Moermond: Yes.
Councilmember Privratsky: I'm open to considerations related to any
miscommunication and language barrier issues. I understand the work was done, but it
can be hard to see the difference between securing a door and boarding when you've
never dealt with it before and there are language barriers.
Councilmember Johnson: The invoice does say that it's just for the doors. I don't think
there was confusion on the doors. Maybe for the windows, though. I hope that what's
being relayed via translation is that the invoice states it is for the doors. Because the
work was done, I would vote against any moderations. Maybe there was space for staff
to be more clear, but the records seems clear.
Yang: I move a two-week layover. I would like my legislative aide to receive any
follow-up information.
Moermond: When I talked to Neis, he told me that DSI was actively working with the
Fire Department to create materials to provide people after a fire. We have a lot of
contractors listening to the radio to find out where fires are, and they descend on
people immediately. Getting basic information up front is something they're working on.
I will do the follow-up as well.
Public hearing closed and laid over to September 3, 2025