Details Meeting Name: Legislative Hearings Agenda status: Final-revised Meeting date/time: 4/11/2019 9:00 AM Minutes status: Final   Meeting location: Room 330 City Hall & Court House Published agenda: Agenda Published minutes: Minutes   Meeting video: Not available   Attachments: Meeting Items (40) Public Comments (52) 40 records Group Clear sorting Clear grouping Group by Type Group by Result Export Export to Excel Export to PDF Export to Word Show: Legislation only Legislation only All agenda items File # Ver. Agenda # Type Title Action Result Action Details Video RLH TA 19-247 1 1 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 833 ASHLAND AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-224 1 2 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 487 DAYTON AVENUE UNIT 1. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-242 1 3 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 756 DAYTON AVENUE, UNIT 4. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-243 1 4 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 322 GOODRICH AVE UNIT 2. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-216 1 5 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 549 GRAND HILL. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-234 1 6 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 761 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-226 1 7 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 882 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051; amend to File No. CG1901A1-1, Assessment No. 190071) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-241 1 8 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2049 HAWTHORNE AVENUE EAST. (File No. CG1901B4, Assessment No. 190060) Laid Over   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-237 1 9 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 546 HOLLY AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Laid Over   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-227 1 10 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 586 LINCOLN AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-214 1 11 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 666 PORTLAND AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-240 1 12 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 25 SANDRA LEE DRIVE WEST. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-205 1 13 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 361 SUMMIT AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-228 1 14 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 434 SUPERIOR STREET. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-200 1 15 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 110 VIRGINIA STREET. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Laid Over   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-203 1 16 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1790 HAGUE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-202 1 17 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 62 MOUNDS BOULEVARD. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Laid Over   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-244 1 18 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 542 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-245 1 19 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 781 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-218 1 20 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1711 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-231 1 21 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 337 CURTICE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-225 1 22 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 305 GEORGE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-232 1 23 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 706 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-207 1 24 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 797 OHIO STREET. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-208 1 25 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 662 OTTAWA AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-233 1 26 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 187 ROBIE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-246 1 27 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 197 ROBIE STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-212 1 28 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 318 SIDNEY STREET WEST. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-217 1 29 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2140 BAYARD AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-215 1 30 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 48 BELVIDERE STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-236 2 31 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2200 ELEANOR AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-248 1 32 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 83 ISABEL STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-213 1 33 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2136 PALACE AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-229 1 34 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2176 RANDOLPH AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-206 1 35 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 268 ROBIE STREET EAST. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Laid Over   Action details Not available RLH TA 19-201 1 36 Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 1768 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-39 1 37 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A1, Assessment No. 190051) Referred   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-40 1 38 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A2, Assessment No. 190055) Referred   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-41 1 39 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A3, Assessment No. 190056) Referred   Action details Not available RLH AR 19-42 1 40 Resolution LH Assessment Roll Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during October to December 2018. (File No. CG1901A4, Assessment No. 190057) Referred   Action details Not available  Add New Comment 52 records Group Clear sorting Clear grouping Group by File # Group by Name Group by District Group by Opinion Export Export to Excel Export to PDF Export to Word File # Date  Name District Opinion Comment Action RLH AR 19-42 5/22/2019 7:43 PM David Thm   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 7:42 PM David Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 7:40 PM David Thm   Against Cannot ***ess property when ***essment has added no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 7:37 PM David Thom   Against Cannot ***ess property when the ***essment adds no value to the property. It’s the law! RLH TA 19-201 5/22/2019 7:17 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-214 5/22/2019 7:16 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-202 5/22/2019 7:15 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-237 5/22/2019 7:14 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-225 5/22/2019 7:12 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-236 5/22/2019 7:11 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-231 5/22/2019 7:09 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-200 5/22/2019 7:01 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-213 5/22/2019 7:01 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH TA 19-217 5/22/2019 7:00 PM Eric Lein   Against ••ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ••ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ••ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ••The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ••Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ••Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. RLH AR 19-42 5/22/2019 6:49 PM Eric Lein   Against ?? ORD 18-39 was not effective until October 10, 2018. ?? ORD 18-39 was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the Council adopted Resolution 18-1922, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient…” ?? ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018. Language in force says: “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” ?? The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. ?? Charges and ***essments for 1, 2, 3 or 4 unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. ?? Invalid Garbage Contract signed after deadline. +1 RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:38 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:38 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:37 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:37 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:36 PM Eric Lein   Against • Invalid Garbage Contract. The haulers’ LLC signed 1-day late and missed the Council’s deadline which clearly states that the contract “…shall be signed by the LLC no later than November 13, 2017.” (See do***ents filed in district court by the City Attorney on May 6, 2019, 16:29. Exhibit H – RES 17-1776.) RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:35 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:35 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:34 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:34 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:34 PM Eric Lein   Against • Charges and ***essments for one, two, three or four unnecessary empty trash carts exceed the benefits to the property and violate MN Stat. Chapter 429 and City Charter Chapter 14. o--- MN Stat. 429.051 – Cost may be ***essed “…based upon the benefits received…” o--- Charter 14.01 – “…in no case shall the amounts ***essed exceed the benefits to the property.” RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:32 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:32 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. +1 RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:31 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:31 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:29 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:29 PM Eric Lein   Against • The City and haulers have not complied with MN Stat. Chapter 443. Rates are not just and reasonable. Rates fail to take into account the character, kind & quality of service, of rubbish & method of disposition. Rates fail to take into account the number of people served. The City must issue the original invoice before exercising its ***essment authority under MN Stat 443.29. Haulers are independent contractors and not “agents, representatives or employees of the City.” Charges by haulers have not been properly billed for ***essment purposes and must NOT be certified to the county or levied against the property. RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:28 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:27 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:27 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:26 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-40 has been suspended since October 2018 and is to be repealed. Language in force says: o--- 357.05(g)(1) – “…This section shall not preclude a****ing property owners from cooperating for arranging for collection services from a licensed hauler, nor other arrangements for reasonable interruption of service.” o--- Property owners who have been “sharing” or who made other reasonable arrangements must not be ***essed for unpaid trash bills issued by haulers who did not remove, collect and dispose of rubbish from the property. The Legislative Hearing Officer improperly recommended denial of appeals that should be allowed. RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 6:24 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. +1 RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 6:24 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. +1 RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 6:23 PM     Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. +1 RLH TA 19-205 5/22/2019 6:23 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 6:22 PM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was not effective until October 10, 2018, thirty (30) days following its p***age, approval and publication. The City should not ***ess for charges that arose before October 10, 2018. RLH TA 19-216 5/22/2019 5:44 PM David Thom   Against Dismiss all ***essments, the matter has yet to be decided by the courts. +1 RLH AR 19-42 5/22/2019 3:29 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. +1 RLH AR 19-41 5/22/2019 3:28 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-40 5/22/2019 3:27 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 3:24 PM David Thom   Against I believe the council should dismiss all ***essments related to the city wide garbage. The council admits there are sufficient signature to put the police to referendum. Future more there is a question if a contract has even been legally executed between the city and the garbage consortium as I stated to each and every council member in my email dated May 18, 2019 to witch not one of the council members has even bother to acknowledge receipt. Again, I urge you to dismiss all garbage bill ***essments. RLH AR 19-39 5/22/2019 1:06 PM       Hold off tax ***essments and recognize those that are participating as neighbor sharers and be reasonable instead of sticking your heels into the ground like a vengeful politician. This is supposed to be about public safety - removing trash that exists, not fining people for not using a trash bin they never ordered or used! How can the City suddenly enforce trash participation in this one way, when people have not had trash service at these addresses for many years due to using less bins, or sharing with a neighbor, and being our most responsible citizens that are generating less waste? Please stop participating in this mania and speak out that this does not feel right and should stop! Thank you. +4 RLH AR 19-42 5/21/2019 9:39 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +4 RLH AR 19-41 5/21/2019 9:38 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 -1 RLH AR 19-40 5/21/2019 9:38 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH AR 19-39 5/21/2019 9:37 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +4 RLH TA 19-205 5/21/2019 9:36 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending azzessments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +3 RLH TA 19-216 5/21/2019 9:35 AM Eric Lein   Against • ORD 18-39 (Chapter 220) was “suspended in its operation” (per City Charter Sec. 8.05) when the City Council adopted Resolution 18-1922 on November 14, 2018, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient but that the subject matter is not appropriate to submit to the electorate.” No trash bills are owed at this time in light of the properly-submitted and legally sufficient Petition. The city must legislate in good faith and carry out its obligations under the Charter. The ordinance must be suspended and submitted to a referendum, or repealed by the Council. Petitioners filed a lawsuit in district court on February 7, 2019. All collection activities and pending ***essments must be put on hold and/or laid over until: • • The lawsuit, Clark vs. City of St. Paul, is decided; and • • Ord 18-39 is approved by voters in a referendum. +4