Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 11-204    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/17/2011
Title: Reducing the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Real Estate Project No. J1114A, Assessment No. 118086 at 1676 MARSHALL AVENUE.
Sponsors: Russ Stark
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Ward - 4
Attachments: 1. 1676 Marshall Ave SA 4.21.11.pdf, 2. 1676 Marshall Ave.Photos.4-21-11.pdf, 3. 1676 Marshall Ave.Photos.5-2-11.pdf
Title
Reducing the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Real Estate Project No. J1114A, Assessment No. 118086 at 1676 MARSHALL AVENUE.

Ward|1010|
Legislative Hearing Officer Recommendation
Reducing the assessment from $430 to $410. (Recommend reduction to $20.00 which is the disposal fee for two tires that were removed. The mattress that was removed was not on this property when order was issued. Mattress was on adjacent property-1680 Marshall Ave-and SA for mattress was sent to that address. We would not normally abate two tires).

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $290.00

Service Charge: $140.00

Total Assessment: $430.00

Gold Card Returned by: MT Housing

Type of Order/Fee: Summary abatement

Nuisance: Two tires

Date of Orders: 4.21.11

Compliance Date: 4.25.11

Re-Check Date: 5.2.11

Date Work Done: 5.3.11

Work Order #: 11-136362

Returned Mail?: No

Comments: Recommend reduction to $20.00 which is the disposal fee for two tires that were removed. The mattress that was removed was not on this property when order was issued. Mattress was on adjacent property-1680 Marshall Ave-and SA for mattress was sent to that address. We would not normally abate two tires.

History of Orders on Property:


Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Property Cleanup Services from May 02 to May 31, 2011 (File No. J1114A, Assessment No. 118086) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.