Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 19-757    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 11/13/2019
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2137 BERKELEY AVENUE. (File No. CG1903A4, Assessment No. 190124)
Sponsors: Chris Tolbert
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 3
Attachments: 1. 2137 Berkeley Ave.Proof of Payment.9-23-19
Related files: RLH AR 19-121
Title

Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for property at 2137 BERKELEY AVENUE. (File No. CG1903A4, Assessment No. 190124)

Hearing Date(s)

Date of LH: 10/3/2019

Time of LH: 11:15 AM

Date of CPH: 11/13/2019

Tax Assessment Worksheet

Postcard Returned by: Mary Bausman-Watkins

Cost: $70.53

Hauling Service(s) Provided: Garbage Service; Apr 1 - Jun 30 2019

Type of Order/Fee: Trash Hauling

Billing Time Period: 2nd Quarter of 2019 (Apr 1 - Jun 30)

Invoice Date(s):

Returned Mail/Notice Concerns?:

Stated Reason for Appeal (if given): The resident has paid the Q2 bill twice over. The first payment to RS during the second qaurter was processed on 04/23/19 for $61.33 and the second payment was processed on 05/29/19  for $64.40. The resident will not be attending as they have provided proof of payment which shows the Q2 bill was referred to the city in error.

Staff Comments: The property owner paid $125.73 total for Quarter 2 2019. The property owner only has 1 64-g and the bill should have been $96.08 without extra charges. Staff is following up with Republic to investigate any extra credits that are owed to the property owner. Staff recommends deleting the assessment.

Body

WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during April to June 2019. (File No. CG1903A4, Assessment No. 190124) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been consider...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.