Saint Paul logo
File #: RES 17-1020    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 7/19/2017
Title: Authorizing not using a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for the Cherokee Regional Park Play Area Improvement and the Highland Community Center Play Area Replacement projects.
Sponsors: Rebecca Noecker, Chris Tolbert
Ward: Cherokee Park, Highland Park, Project Labor Agreement (PLA)
Attachments: 1. Cherokee PLA Staff Report, 2. Highland PLA Staff Report
Title
Authorizing not using a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for the Cherokee Regional Park Play Area Improvement and the Highland Community Center Play Area Replacement projects.

Body

WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council adopted a policy on the use of Project Labor Agreements (“PLA”) pursuant to Council File #09-584 for projects involving $250,000 or more of city money; and

WHEREAS, the Department of Parks and Recreation is undertaking improvements to the following sites using CIB or Legacy funds as noted, with project total budgets over $250,000:

Cherokee Regional Park Play Area Improvements
Project Description: The play area is to be renovated replacing old play equipment with new play equipment.
Estimated Cost: $342,000
Estimated Start Date: Summer 2017
Estimated Project Length: 3 months

Highland Community Center Play Area Replacement
Project Description: This project includes removal of trees, concrete sidewalk, retaining walls, tennis court, and play equipment, installation of new concrete walks, play equipment, safety surfacing, site furnishings, and landscaping.
Estimated Cost: $447,701.81
Estimated start date: October 16, 2017
Estimated project length: 3 Months

WHEREAS, the Department of Parks and Recreation sent a written “Notice and Request for Recommendation on the Use of a PLA” to interested parties on May 9, 2017 with one response received; and

WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Building and Construction Trades Council which stated, “Dollar Amount; Length of Project; and Multi-craft” as reasons they recommend a PLA for these projects, with no other recommendations for using a PLA; and

WHEREAS, the PLA response form offered no specifics which would indicate concerns over dollar amount, length of project, or multi-craft; and

WHEREAS, the Project Manager has recommended against the use of a PLA for the following reasons:

1) the projects are being bid as a lump sum and labor rates are established by prevailing wage...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.