Saint Paul logo
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: ABZA 16-3    Version: 1
Type: Appeal-BZA Status: Archived
In control: City Council
Final action: 8/3/2016
Title: Public hearing to consider the appeal of Patrick Lindmark to a decision of Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) denying a rear yard setback variance needed to remove an existing three-car detached garage in the rear yard, and construct a new, three-car garage addition connected to the rear of the house by an enclosed breezeway, at 975 Lincoln Avenue.
Sponsors: Rebecca Noecker
Code sections: Sec. 66.231. - Density and dimensional standards table.
Attachments: 1. 975 Lincoln appeal and basis for appeal, 2. 975 Lincoln Elevation and floor plans, 3. 975 Lincoln correspondences, 4. 975 Lincoln site conditions, 5. 975 Lincoln variance application and narrative, 6. 975 Lincoln Resolution, staff report and minutes, 7. 975 Lincoln area map, 8. 975 LINCOLN Photos, 9. Klun letter, 10. Emails Against, 11. Cieslak Email
Related files: RES 16-1541

Title

Public hearing to consider the appeal of Patrick Lindmark to a decision of Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) denying a rear yard setback variance needed to remove an existing three-car detached garage in the rear yard, and construct a new, three-car garage addition connected to the rear of the house by an enclosed breezeway, at 975 Lincoln Avenue. 

 

Body

See attached BZA Resolution.

 

Required Background Information

On May 9, 2016, the BZA denied a similar variance request submitted by David Klun, the contractor for the new garage project.  The property owners are being represented this time by their attorney who submitted the same variance request as the one previously submitted by the contractor.  On July 6, 2016, the BZA once again denied the variance request after holding a public hearing where all parties were afforded an opportunity to be heard.  The appellant is appealing the denial by the BZA.  The applicant's grounds for appeal are included in the attached appeal documents. 

 

 

Does this issue fall within the 60 day rule?  Yes

 

If yes, when does the 60 days expire? August 11, 2016

 

Has an extension been granted?  No

 

If so, to what date?

 

Please explain.]

 

Key Staff Contact

Yaya Diatta

 

 

 

Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.