Saint Paul logo
File #: ABZA 16-2    Version: 1
Type: Appeal-BZA Status: Archived
In control: City Council
Final action: 6/1/2016
Title: Public hearing to consider the appeal of Andrew Rorrig & Amanda Karls to a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) approving variances of the front, side, and rear setbacks, and lot coverage requirements in order to construct an eight - unit apartment building with underground and surface parking at 1174 Grand Avenue.
Sponsors: Rebecca Noecker
Code sections: Sec. 66.231. - Density and dimensional standards table., Sec. 66.232. - Maximum lot coverage.
Attachments: 1. 1174 Grand Appeal application docs 1 of 5, 2. 1174 Grand Appeal application docs 2 of 5, 3. 1174 Grand Appeal application docs 3 of 5, 4. 1174 Grand Appeal application docs 4 of 5, 5. 1174 Grand Appeal application docs 5 of 5, 6. 1174 Grand Ave. variance application docs 1 of 2, 7. 1174 Grand Ave. variance application docs 2 of 2, 8. 1174 Grand Ave. support letters, 9. 1174 Grand Ave. Staff report and BZA Resolution, 10. 1174 Grand Ave. BZA minutes, 11. 1174 Grand Ave. City Council Resolution & minutes on appeal of initial variance BZA decision, 12. 1174 Grand Avenue site maps, 13. 1174 Grand Ave. previous site condition, 14. Front and rear elevation of new building, 15. 1174 Grand Ave. new site pictures, 16. BleuAnt - Response to Appeal 20160526, 17. Hols letter re 1174 Grand appeal, 18. 1174 Grand Public Comment, 19. 1174 Grand - Christenson email
Related files: RES 16-1073
Title
Public hearing to consider the appeal of Andrew Rorrig & Amanda Karls to a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) approving variances of the front, side, and rear setbacks, and lot coverage requirements in order to construct an eight - unit apartment building with underground and surface parking at 1174 Grand Avenue.

Body
Among purposes of these dimensional standards and lot coverage requirements are to ensure that buildings are constructed in a manner that provides regularity in pattern and spacing, to not create overly dense sites, and to not overly burden adjacent properties with impacts created by the new development. The proposed building is generally consistent with the size, the form and the setbacks of the immediate multi-family buildings to the east and to the west. The spacing provided would allow adequate light and air access to property, meeting a purpose of intent of the zoning code. The proposed lot coverage is comparable to that of the immediate buildings to the east and to the west and allows underground parking to be provided.

The proposed site development would provide housing opportunities. It is consistent with Policy 1.2 of the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, which states: “Encourage the development of attached single-family and neighborhood-sensitive multi-family infill housing at appropriate locations as identified in the Land Use Plan and small area plans to increase housing choice.”

The size of the parcel makes it challenging to construct a multiple-family building comparable in scale, spacing and bulk to the existing adjacent apartment buildings to the east and to west of the site that are also zoned RM2. The requested variances are needed to permit a reasonable use of this property to allow a development consistent with existing spacing between buildings, the pattern of the block and the form of existing buildings in the immediate area. It also allows underground parking, which the existing buildin...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.